Tut, tut Eldon, that's a conspiracy theory![]()
Sorry
I meant its Dexter you have to impress

Tut, tut Eldon, that's a conspiracy theory![]()

Sorry![]()
I meant its Dexter you have to impress![]()
![]()
And there's me thinking you boys didn't like the truth 
I've already said that Cardiff City Football Club owns 100% of the Stadium, if you think this is wrong then prove it.
I have a 24 inch penis. Prove me wrong.
Just because you say something doesn't make it right. I have given you a link to a Government Department which will reveal the truth. It's up to you if you want to pursue it.


I think it's fair to say that ground capacity is not that critical in this day and age of TV revenue!.......................
PS: That wasn't a very nice welcome you gave out team coach, how childish of you, some things never change!...
Like Swans PLAYERS with silly flags and silly actions, mind you I thought the bald one was showing that they were out of their depth.
I think it's fair to say that ground capacity is not that critical in this day and age of TV revenue!.......................
PS: That wasn't a very nice welcome you gave out team coach, how childish of you, some things never change!................![]()
Yes there is the point of growing wage bills, but when you are the lowest in the league and finish 11th, then there is no rush to go out and increase that wage bill substantially, just look at QPR on how NOT to run a football club by spending stupidly trying to buy success. A way that has proven to be useless on a number of occasions. Its all about living within your means and also about running the club correctly, now our way is just one of a number of ways you can correctly run a club. We have no debt, we have no sugar daddy, yet we are still here competing with the best, and have done for the past 2 years, we are now in the Europa league, which goes to show what can be done by running a club in the right way. Is it sustainable, we don't know, of course as success grows, so will our wage bill, and fee's paid out to new players, but at the same time, whilst we are not running into debt over it, then there is nothing to really worry about.
I know somewhere in this thread someone claimed we sold Allen to bring in cash, however we had no choice with Allen, as Liverpool met his buy out clause, we wanted to keep Allen, however we didn't exactly sniff at the £15m we gained form his sale. We are not a selling club, we will not sell our main assests unless its out of our hands, such as the Allen case. If we were in it for the money, we would have looked to have sold Ash during the summer, but instead basically set his price high enough so Arsenal would not bother, same as we set Michu's price high enough that people won't bother, why? Because we are not a club who sells our biggest assets.
Indeed Hilts, otherwise you could be a Wolves (31,700), a Leeds (39,460), a Leicester (32,262) sort of club. So even bigger stadiums cannot help you..

Sorry I didn't really make the point about the wages properly.
Williams and Michu are attracting richer sides (I wont say bigger). In the summer their agents will say something along the lines of "Arsenal want him again, they'll pay £80k a week match it or he's not signing a deal and leaving for free or throwing his toys out of the pram".
Therefore to stand still as a successful side you'll need to massively increase that wage bill. As players develop they'll attract richer sides. If they're not wanted then you're probably not doing that well.
Something that is in your favour is how badly Sinclar and Allen have done since leaving for big money. I'd be scared of taking on one of your stars for big money after seeing those 2 fail as miserably as they have. They were both massively overpriced (great business by Jenkins).
So I agree you will probably be able to price your players out of moves as Jenkins price list doesn't represent any sort of value but keeping players happy when Arsenal and co are circling is a different matter unless you smash your pay structure and move the club forward year on year.
The reason I said 38 games is the bench mark is our home matches after Saturday will have been City, Utd, Arsenal, Spurs, Everton (5 of last seasons top 6), Swansea and Newcastle! You have to play everyone to make a fair comparison but I said before a ball was kicked I expect us to finish below Swansea this year.
Funny how Liverpool, Spurs, West Ham are all building or moving and Arsenal have just spent the last 8 or so years struggling to pay for their new ground at the expense of squad development. Pity they didn't read this thread before wasting all those millions.
Quite right Dai - his dogpaddle was rubbish. Can you play the marrackahs by any chance?
[video=youtube;yEBD9o_0zF0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEBD9o_0zF0[/video]

Nice one PGF 
We don't tend to buckle under threats such as those, hence why Pratley left on a free (one player that was crucial to our way of playing), and as did Dorus (another who wanted silly wages). Players may think they are worth however much they like, but we as a club will only pay them what we think they are worth, how many times did you see us go for players who would not suit our wage budget, that we have walked away from, we won't be dictated to by agents, players and the like, the players who come here know the deal, it of course won't always work like that, but if Ash came in demanding a wage hike because another club have offered it, then we tell him where to go and run his contract out, he is currently contracted to 2015 i believe, so that is 2 years, and for someone who is 29 already, well would be just short of his 31st birthday, who will offer him 80k a week then.
The problem is people seem to think we buy a player, and that he can then dictate what he wants, if a player refuses to sign a contract with what we want to offer, then I am more than happy for them to be shown the door when their contract ends, but no sooner than that. They are after all contracted to us. Its the problem with the game, such as Rooney getting his way by dictating at United, players hold all the power, however to the best of my knowledge, we have never been put in the position that we have folded to player demands, we instead sit them on the bench, or in the reserves, or run their contracts out.
Even if the likes of Arsenal came a calling, they pay our value for a player, or they move along. We turned down Liverpool when they offered I think it was £14m for Allen (i think, i can't really remember) and £14m for Allen would have been a steal, but we didn't want to sell him. Money is not everything. But it certainly does help.
That is fair enough, it is a tough run of games, which is why I agreed with your point about it not being set in stone til after the season is over, as our current standings are based on teams we have played, which your home run has been tougher than ours, although ours hasn't been that easy either. But, I am merely repaying the favour of what we endured over on 606 during our time in the Championshipand it is a nice feeling
![]()
Pratley was never worth £15-20 mill though!
Increasing the capacity of a stadium is part of growing as a club, but the point being made is it is not as beneficial as some seem to believe.
There are a few factors, and clubs like us need to consider these factors. When your stadium is bigger, you may be able to sell out, but it also comes down to supply and demand. Now you could sell out a premier league game of 33k seats, but to do so you would have to drop your prices, we on the other hand have invested that money in our youth system, which in the long term will put our club in a better position, and even then we can sell our ticket prices for higher due to supply and demand, and still make just as much money.
Now lower prices serve fans well, as it means it becomes more affordable, but we are not talking about affordability for fans, we are talking about profits for a club. Now if you look at Man Utd, they have the demand, so can sell out their much bigger stadium, at a high price, same as Arsenal with their huge stadium, and high price, us smaller clubs do not have that luxury.
If you look at us and yourselves, now we class our games as cat a and b, which is £45/£35 for adults and £22.50/£17.50 for kids and oaps. That is all round the ground. So a flat figure. Your club however don't do that, you have 3 classes, and zone 4 in your stadium for example can be bought for as little as £20 for an adult.
So you may have a bigger stadium, but as you do not offer flat rates, and your highest prices are on par with us, do you really earn more money for a home game than us?