LB and RB

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Kaboul is like Verts in the fact he is so versitile and can play in any position along the back or a DM and for me that makes the depth in our defence so great when all are fit!
 
Players who have the vision and intelligence that Tom Carroll possesses, rarely get caught out. They're always one step ahead and they've made their next move before they've even received the ball.
Gerrard is a prime example of this. Loads of time on the ball, finds spaces and spreads the play. - He's not exactly a big lad either.

Holtby is the same,and i think he will come good next season,when he has had time to settle in
 
Kaboul is like Verts in the fact he is so versitile and can play in any position along the back or a DM and for me that makes the depth in our defence so great when all are fit!

"Verts-atile" <laugh>
 
Players who have the vision and intelligence that Tom Carroll possesses, rarely get caught out. They're always one step ahead and they've made their next move before they've even received the ball.
Gerrard is a prime example of this. Loads of time on the ball, finds spaces and spreads the play. - He's not exactly a big lad either.

I expect the same as he does have great vision and excellent space awareness but the pessimist in me says he could be lightweight (i know the comparisons with Modric on this one)
 
I expect the same as he does have great vision and excellent space awareness but the pessimist in me says he could be lightweight (i know the comparisons with Modric on this one)

well, there ya go. you've answered your own fears by mentioning Modric <ok>
 
does anyone think kaboul might be the answer at RB?

I'm split between two minds.

Kaboul is very good at RB, yes he's better at CB but for the sake of a stronger defence overall, I think Kaboul at RB with Dawson/ Caulker in the centre with Verts (or even Verts LB with Daws & Caulker in the centre together) would actually result in a more solid back line. Kaboul's no slouch (as admitted by Walker himself) so those worried about the pace aspect being lost shouldn't be.

So do we go for a potentially stronger/ solid back line with Kaboul RB, OR play him in his favoured and best position which I suppose would strengthen the back line anyway. Toughie.

What sways Kaboul at RB for me is the hope that Caulker can get more games, his potential won't/ can't be reached sitting on the bench.
 
Kaboul is like Verts in the fact he is so versitile and can play in any position along the back or a DM and for me that makes the depth in our defence so great when all are fit!

Can you imagine a back four of Kaboul, Dawson, Caulker, Vertonghen. I think most teams would be cacking themselves at corners, if only we could deliver one into the right area.
 
Can you imagine a back four of Kaboul, Dawson, Caulker, Vertonghen. I think most teams would be cacking themselves at corners, if only we could deliver one into the right area.

away against the best teams that is a good line up. Not overly ambitious going forward as a back 4 and as you say absolutely terrifying at set pieces.
 
In fairness to Naughton, he's spent most of this season at his less comfortable Left Back position, so his transfer from Norwich wonderkid to Tottenham failure shouldn't be considered too much. Saying this, next season, I think the two RB's we have should be alternated more, just so Walker doesn't get complacent, and Naughton gains needed confidence.

With regards to Kaboul's pace, I'm sure I read somewhere that Kaboul was the fastest sprinter we had on the team when the players race each other, so pace, if he has to fill in at RB shouldn't really be a concern if I'm correct.
 
I don't doubt Dembele is the right player to pair with Sandro, but have started to wonder myself if Carroll wouldn't be better to pair with Parker. It's certainly a big risk, but Dembele has had very few really good games paired with Parker, and I get the feeling Carroll would be a better match; better able to start the team going forward. Parker would need to stay back more, but he seems to still do that well. It's his going forward which seems to have dropped off.