Last night's performance

G

Gills_Steve

Active Member
Apr 4, 2011
294
76
28
Woking, Surrey
... was of course very poor. Very worried about our midfield - it looks very, very weak without Payne, Wright or Jackman. And of course home form in general is a worry.

My player ratings:

Nelson - 9 - Gills Motm by a long, long way. Kept us in it for most of the 2nd half.

Fish - 6 - Some decent forays forward, but partly at fault for the goal
Martin - 7 - played alright but for one error. It was definitely not a penalty (early 2nd half), despite what the co-commentator claimed.
Barett - 6 - somewhat shaky for him
Legge - 4 - Very shakey throughout, and often seemingly out of position

Frampton - 5 - Ineffectual but at least vaguely solid defensively
Gregory - 4 - can't remember anything good from him, and lost the ball to enable them to score their goal
Lee - 6 - below par, but good long throws
Weston - 7 - One of the few players to look dangerous

Burton 6 - ineffectual with little service
McDonald - 6 - ditto

Subs:
Whelpdale - 6 - Was ok, but Weston should never have come off
Kedwell - 5 - put himself about, but to little effect
Robinson - not on long enough to rate... didn't really notice him having an impact
 
Gills_Steve said:
... was of course very poor. Very worried about our midfield - it looks very, very weak without Payne, Wright or Jackman. And of course home form in general is a worry.

My player ratings:

Nelson - 9 - Gills Motm by a long, long way. Kept us in it for most of the 2nd half.

Fish - 6 - Some decent forays forward, but partly at fault for the goal
Martin - 7 - played alright but for one error. It was definitely not a penalty (early 2nd half), despite what the co-commentator claimed.
Barett - 6 - somewhat shaky for him
Legge - 4 - Very shakey throughout, and often seemingly out of position

Frampton - 5 - Ineffectual but at least vaguely solid defensively
Gregory - 4 - can't remember anything good from him, and lost the ball to enable them to score their goal
Lee - 6 - below par, but good long throws
Weston - 7 - One of the few players to look dangerous

Burton 6 - ineffectual with little service
McDonald - 6 - ditto

Subs:
Whelpdale - 6 - Was ok, but Weston should never have come off
Kedwell - 5 - put himself about, but to little effect
Robinson - not on long enough to rate... didn't really notice him having an impact
Click to expand...


Steve if you think Fish deserves more than Legge and Frampton more than Gregory, I think you need to watch that match again...if you can bare to !

Nelson was a clear best of our bunch followed by Legge & Weston, though no one really deserves any praise other than Nelson keeping the score down.
 
Gills_Steve said:
... was of course very poor. Very worried about our midfield - it looks very, very weak without Payne, Wright or Jackman. And of course home form in general is a worry.

My player ratings:

Nelson - 9 - Gills Motm by a long, long way. Kept us in it for most of the 2nd half.

Fish - 6 - Some decent forays forward, but partly at fault for the goal
Martin - 7 - played alright but for one error. It was definitely not a penalty (early 2nd half), despite what the co-commentator claimed.
Barett - 6 - somewhat shaky for him
Legge - 4 - Very shakey throughout, and often seemingly out of position

Frampton - 5 - Ineffectual but at least vaguely solid defensively
Gregory - 4 - can't remember anything good from him, and lost the ball to enable them to score their goal
Lee - 6 - below par, but good long throws
Weston - 7 - One of the few players to look dangerous

Burton 6 - ineffectual with little service
McDonald - 6 - ditto

Subs:
Whelpdale - 6 - Was ok, but Weston should never have come off
Kedwell - 5 - put himself about, but to little effect
Robinson - not on long enough to rate... didn't really notice him having an impact
Click to expand...

Robinson..Not on long enough to rate???? A whole 45 mins, twice as long as Kedwell and Whelpdale!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back