Thanks Captain Obvious.
You knew exactly what I meant.
Yet you still felt the need to make a ****y post.
Well done.
Nothing ****y about it, you just posted something really stupid.
No good moaning at me just because I pointed it out.
Thanks Captain Obvious.
You knew exactly what I meant.
Yet you still felt the need to make a ****y post.
Well done.
It is an absolute disaster that whole junction. I pulled a woman back from crossing the bit going to what was Shire Horse. She just didnt look left, had her little son with her. The bus, which was steaming through, missed her by inches.
Actually it was a reasonable point in that Leeds and Sheffield are more easily accessible to a large number of people than Hull is.Nothing ****y about it, you just posted something really stupid.
No good moaning at me just because I pointed it out.
The root of the problem is those entrusted with the decision making.
Our most talented people go into the private sector and build their commercial and entrepreneurial skills trying to grow their business by being customer-centric. i.e. Giving customers what they actually want.
Those who go into the Public Sector particularly those who get themselves into decision making positions at Councils have little commercial experience. They progress by becoming adept in the protocols of committees and its decision making processes. They hire consultants to do their thinking for them, but usually these are of the financial type who usually just look at the world through a de-risking lens.
The answer: privatise Councils and get rid of the dead wood and layers of bureaucracy.
Actually it was a reasonable point in that Leeds and Sheffield are more easily accessible to a large number of people than Hull is.
I know Steve Plater who runs the Dinosaur museum in the Fruit Market had something to do with proposals for a skyrail system in Hull.
The current overhead railway could and should be utilised better though. I heard there was also once proposals to create a park N'rail system at the end of the M62 for freight lorries to be loaded onto trains and shipped to the ports to free up the A63 for cars.
Perhaps we could team up with Flamingo Land and use their cable cars to ship people between the interchange and the KC Stadium, haha.
So whose fault is it when they walk across without looking and are hit by a vehicle which has got a green light? Are only drivers supposed to take notice of red lights?
You only have to look at pedestrians at any crossing. Stand and wait until the light is green, no problems. Instead they jig about looking fir a break in traffic and then steam across. Unfortunately do this where traffic is approaching from more than one direction without looking both ways properly and there is chance of disaster. But, hey, it is people's right to do what they want and ignore regulations and then blame everyone else when something goes wrong.
The regulations say that motor vehicles cede to pedestrians and cyclists as they have priority on the road. A green light doesn't mean go, it means proceed with caution.
That might be what the regulations say, but in practical terms if you step out into the road in front of a car, you'll get squished and as long as it was a green light and the driver wasn't speeding, he faces no chance of prosecution for squishing them.
That junction really is ****, but it's the bus drivers turning in at ridiculous speeds that make it really dangerous. Jameson Street used to bad as well, pedestrians on the pavement were regularly hit by the wing mirrors of lorries and buses.
If you run someone over on a crossing, you run the very real risk of being charged with undue care and attention or manslaughter. The colour of the light may well be offered as mitigation to reduce the sentence, but it's not always going to be accepted as a defence.
So, lights mean nothing if a pedestrian ignores them but a driver can be prosecuted even if he was driving within the speed limits with the lights on green and some brain dead numpty,oblivious to what is going on due to the music blasting through his headphones or because they are engrossed in texting walks straight in front of them?
Yep, pretty much. The onus is on the driver.
Yep, pretty much. The onus is on the driver.
There are matching pedestrian lights, if the driver follows the lights and the pedestrian doesn't, the driver faces zero chance of prosecution.
Nonsense.
Good luck trying that one.
The lights mean proceed with caution. Even if they're green, you still have to wait for pedestrians to clear. Ploughing through as you're suggesting would possibly result in a charge of causing death by dangerous driving. It'd certainly be stupid and ignorant.
Good luck trying that one.
The lights mean proceed with caution. Even if they're green, you still have to wait for pedestrians to clear. Ploughing through as you're suggesting would possibly result in a charge of causing death by dangerous driving. It'd certainly be stupid and ignorant.
Who said anything about ploughing through? I was referring to a driver proceeding lawfully with the lights on green when some thick as pig **** divvy decides they can just step straight across the road without looking or paying attention. Stupid and ignorant behaviour. Almost as stupid and ignorant as justifying or excusing such behaviour.
Pedestrian Crossing Offences
These are strict liability offences, but not defenceless. Motor Lawyers will advise you properly on the implications of "strict liability" and how this effects your defence and the manner in which such cases are prosecuted.
A strict liability offence means that if the incident has occurred, you are guilty of the offence. For example, if you knock down a pedestrian who is on a pedestrian crossing, the offence is committed. However, in our experience, the offence is never really that straight forward and in many cases the motorist does have the basis of a defence. For example, was the pedestrian actually within the confines of the crossing, was the car already on the crossing when the pedestrian ran out?
Many ofour competitors will recommend guilty pleas without considering the evidence and your account.
http://www.motorlawyers.co.uk/offences/pedestrian_crossing.php
But drivers do plough through. Too many people have died here. Thats why its an "accident black spot". Some places just are. I lost a friend at Melton, another "accident blackspot" that took ****ing years to sort out. How many died before they did.Who said anything about ploughing through? I was referring to a driver proceeding lawfully with the lights on green when some thick as pig **** divvy decides they can just step straight across the road without looking or paying attention. Stupid and ignorant behaviour. Almost as stupid and ignorant as justifying or excusing such behaviour.