The law is the law but look at every situation on it's own merit.
There's a difference between someone slightly over the limit due to an oversight vs someone who's driving home pissed after a night out.
If he had drunk a quarter of a glass less he'd have been ok.
There's a difference between being a toe over the line and being a mile over it.
He was punished because he crossed a line that has to be drawn somewhere, and he crossed it, I just don't appreciate people painting all offenders with the same brush sometimes.
He was only slightly over, he shouldn't be jailed or suspended for this. It's not severe enough of an offence IMO.
I don't think anybody is saying anything otherwise. If he had been a mile over the line and not a toe over it then he would be going to prison. He wasn't though and he has been punished and it is dealt with. It's still wrong to be a toe over the line though, and would be just as wrong to pretend it was ok as it would to be over reacting.
