It will be interesting to see how this one pans out, as far as we know we've signed a talented alcoholic with a bad attitude and a penchant for McDonalds. On the plus side, Bengals rates his performances on tv, despite almost none of his games being televised. Personally, I reckon we're onto a winner.
Well we didn't lose anybody, so there wasn't a desperate need to replace anybody. We have the whole squad until the Summer now and it's the squad that's got us to the top of the league. I'm a tad surprised there wasn't more interest in our players to be honest.
I was really only worried about loosing Diame, so all in all a good window regardless of who we signed. I will say though I think it'll take Powell a few weeks to get up to speed but if we get him performing as he can for say the last 10 games it will only be a Brucie Bonus
Aye, you're still second. That makes Rhodes nearly as expensive as our Uruguay International - Hernandez. Personally, you've now added too much and he'll now have a period to bed players in. The same mistake that Derby have made. Fortunately as we're top,we didn't feel the need to make so many unnecessary changes.
No, but I liked them a lot back in the days before you landed on the planet. Like some others on here, I support only one team, but enjoy watching the best football and its best players. Have a nice day.
You have many teams. Liverpool, Spurs, Man Utd. What is your order of preference, how do you feel when they have to play one another? Loyalties must be divided. Tragic.
Although I feel Mcgregor has being doing quite well.this season, should we play Kuciak? Or has Steve Bruce brought him in for the Premier League? Or is he just another Jakupovic? I other words, why have we signed him? He looks too good to be sat on the bench but Mcgregor has warranted his place this year! It seems a weird signing