S
Super G Ted'inho
Guest
I have finally decided this.
so hear me out.
I still firmly believe that DM is bad..... now let me clarify and call the position you guys want a "holding" midfield role. as in he hold position so that he is goal side when the opposition get it whereas a "box to box" player may be off pressing further up etc.
My contention is holding is what pirlo or alonso would do while defensive is what other negative players would do.
I would contend that you could make lucas a holding player and rafa did... you could make henderson one with a bit of coaching... if you had have beaten gerrard about the head when he was 24 you could make him one then... at 32? we'll see....
You cannot make scott parker or gareth barry into a more free player per the attached diagram
You must log in or register to see images
zone 3 is where the holding midfielder sits but he is expected to be the guy who not only goes and make tackles and breaks up play but also be the guy who gets the first pass from the CBs or form the keeper or form whomever wins it back and he mis distribute well.... and not only in terms of pass completion but in terms of positivity.
this is why when real bought alonso their president was quoted as he was the only guy in the world capable of doing what they needed.
So extend this thought.... this diagram shows attacking play positions, not defensive ones. draw if for defending and the two midfielders drop back in to make it tight... if you are alonso in zone 3 or busquets... then you want ozil and khederia OR xavi and iniesta in front of you to pass to... so the question is looking at lucas if you press him do you shut lfc down?
you need a serious player in this role... my question is can henderson not fill this role or do we need to buy to complete with lucas... should we not spend in the box to box area and be done with it.
So, in short, you see a DM as someone like Mascherano who sole purpose is to defend the back line no matter what and a HM as someone like Alonso who likes to be behind the ball but is there to play and be part of the attacking team?
I can understand that view. I disagree about the need for a HM over a DM though. But then, although a big fan of Lucas, I'm not convinced he is good enough to be a fixed cog in a CL side.

