In no position do we have any cover with only 14 fit players.
We currently need new players. But selling one takes us backwards rather than forwards down to 13 players. So that money we have made still has to go towards taking that number back up to 14.
So say we get £10million for Livermore. (which is unlikely that 100% is reinvested)
But hypothetically we have 10 million to spend. A percentage of that is spent on taking the squad back to 14 players.
As we know having a ten million pound budget doesn't mean you have 10 million to spend on purely transfer fees. It covers signing on fees, agent fees, bonuses and other expenses.
So in the Premier League in the January transfer window when all fees are notoriously inflated. When we are in a relegation battle with a national/ international reputation problem I don't personally see how 10 million for Livermore (one of our best players and reasons we haven't been cut adrift at the bottom of the league) can improve us.
Fair. If it happened in Summer then I can understand somewhat. But now there is no benefit in breaking up the already threadbare squad and try to bring in players who are going to struggle to adapt quickly and be up to pace with the relegation battle.