Transfer Rumours January '22 Transfer Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
The loan back option should be of zero interest and it defeats the point of the move. KLP seems to think he's good enough for the PL, so why would he want to come back on loan?

It doesn't make sense, if he wants more money, I'm sure we can give him and improved contract until he's actually ready for the PL.

And loan players are never treated as well as permanent players. He'd find himself on the bench a hell of a lot more as Jack Clarke did when he stayed on loan at Leeds. His development is no longer our concern.
 
Shark Sports said:
The loan back option should be of zero interest and it defeats the point of the move. KLP seems to think he's good enough for the PL, so why would he want to come back on loan?

It doesn't make sense, if he wants more money, I'm sure we can give him and improved contract until he's actually ready for the PL.

And loan players are never treated as well as permanent players. He'd find himself on the bench a hell of a lot more as Jack Clarke did when he stayed on loan at Leeds. His development is no longer our concern.
Click to expand...

Zero interest for who?

He can think he's good enough all he wants, doesn't make it so.

It would be a win-win-win for a loan back to be part of any deal, but it's a moot point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NewcastleTiger
Shark Sports said:
The loan back option should be of zero interest and it defeats the point of the move. KLP seems to think he's good enough for the PL, so why would he want to come back on loan?

It doesn't make sense, if he wants more money, I'm sure we can give him and improved contract until he's actually ready for the PL.

And loan players are never treated as well as permanent players. He'd find himself on the bench a hell of a lot more as Jack Clarke did when he stayed on loan at Leeds. His development is no longer our concern.
Click to expand...

I don’t think he would as he’s easily our best player. If he’s fit he’s on the pitch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14 and NewcastleTiger
Shark Sports said:
The loan back option should be of zero interest and it defeats the point of the move. KLP seems to think he's good enough for the PL, so why would he want to come back on loan?

It doesn't make sense, if he wants more money, I'm sure we can give him and improved contract until he's actually ready for the PL.

And loan players are never treated as well as permanent players. He'd find himself on the bench a hell of a lot more as Jack Clarke did when he stayed on loan at Leeds. His development is no longer our concern.
Click to expand...
I'd rather loan him in than another premier league youngster who has no attachment to the club.
 
GLP said:
Yes, just confirmed in the press conference he is the player currently having a medical.
Click to expand...

Can you sign and register a player "subject to a medical", I know you can on deadline day. Otherwise, guess he will have to wait till next week for his debut.
 
If KLP is sold for £12m how much do you think The Allams will get from the deal? They could have sold him for £8m earlier. So they will get at least £10m that's why Acun is saying no less than £20m
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back