Whatabout Bertrand in a back 3, with McQueen or Targett as LWB?
We still have options.
Of course. Forgot that. Good point, well Made.
Whatabout Bertrand in a back 3, with McQueen or Targett as LWB?
We still have options.
On another note Archers did you manage to get the 6th off for Fulham?

On another note Archers did you manage to get the 6th off for Fulham?
Yes I did, but I only found out Monday, and by then we'd sold out.
Edit; just checked the OS, looks like they might have increased our allocation? Just bought my ticket![]()

See my original thought was the same in not needing one but I have called for a back 3 and that would scupper any idea of seeing that regularly.
Be nice to see it for a few games in a row before January...
We’re going to do what the FLD did and do it mid Jan and go on a 6 game clean sheet run.
? Who did the match day threads for those?
They need him bad too. Only weak link in their squad really.City want Van Dijk bad
City want Van Dijk bad
70M and they can have him.
Exactly, let's rinse them and get a couple of quality attacking players in. We have enough CBs to cover, it's not like VVD has bothered his backside this season for us70M and they can have him.
Exactly, let's rinse them and get a couple of quality attacking players in. We have enough CBs to cover, it's not like VVD has bothered his backside this season for us
Do you think that if we let them have him they will take Les Reed on a bogof?City want Van Dijk bad
City want Van Dijk bad
The fact that it is City should mean that the fee is suitably ludicrous. When's the last time they paid anything other than top dollar?City want Van Dijk bad
The fact that it is City should mean that the fee is suitably ludicrous. When's the last time they paid anything other than top dollar?