Jack Cork liked Boruc's Instagram post which was a picture saying: "Never push a loyal person to the point where they no longer give a damn."
Hope we have a target in mind to back up Forster, because there a big difference in locker room comity between an upset Schneiderlin (or Cork, or whatever) and an enraged Boruc.
How do we know he is enraged?
We're not "pushing a loyal person", we're trying to improve the club. The club that pay your wages. The club that is the number one priority in all this. Not you. This isn't all about you. If you believe yourself to be better than what's being brought in, go prove it on the training ground you moaning bunch of twats.
Make yourselves the indispensable one.
The club that is the number one priority in all this. Not you. This isn't all about you. If you believe yourself to be better than what's being brought in, go prove it on the training ground you moaning bunch of t**ts.
Make yourselves the indispensable one.
We're not "pushing a loyal person", we're trying to improve the club. The club that pay your wages. The club that is the number one priority in all this. Not you. This isn't all about you. If you believe yourself to be better than what's being brought in, go prove it on the training ground you moaning bunch of twats.
Make yourselves the indispensable one.
Prove it on the training ground? Come on. Koeman immediately said Forster is first choice. Unless Forster ****s up consistently he will start. Boruc is competing for an international place and has come into Saints, made a massive difference to the club and played well enough to be called one of the best keepers in the league by quite a few pundits. Why shouldn't he be upset when he's replaced for no apparent reason?
But as has been said already it's for a very good reason. What club would dream about being counted among the best without having too decent goalies? It's called depth, and it is not beyond us.
Prove it on the training ground? Come on. Koeman immediately said Forster is first choice. Unless Forster ****s up consistently he will start. Boruc is competing for an international place and has come into Saints, made a massive difference to the club and played well enough to be called one of the best keepers in the league by quite a few pundits. Why shouldn't he be upset when he's replaced for no apparent reason?
As I've said several times that's a very good argument for replacing Davis and Gazzaniga but not an argument for replacing Boruc.But as has been said already it's for a very good reason. What club would dream about being counted among the best without having too decent goalies? It's called depth, and it is not beyond us.
Right but Boruc hasn't done anything wrong under Koeman and has contributed a lot to our recent success. I agree that it's better everyone knows where they stand but I find the double standard here a bit strange. The other day/week Javier Hernandez was linked with Juve and people said he shouldn't go there because he won't play. There were a few comments about Chambers moving to Arsenal to sit on the bench too. But when one of our players wants to leave (perhaps) because he's been told he won't play he gets criticised as well. It's bizarre.This "no apparent reason" is that the man who picks the team thinks the other player is better than him. That is the managers job. I think it's good that Ron has told him.
He did post this http://instagram.com/p/rtZrLJgHRI/