Why, you don't have to read it. it Do you have a view on his comments, are they justified? Can you follow the timeline, recognise an opinion and see clear acceptance of other opinions? Do you not wonder why he can make allegations but shies from supporting them with fact. He uses the retreat and try and belittle tactic of someone who has been found out. Yes, it been a thread of revelation, we can see someone who likes to argue but can't. can't The whole point of a forum is to discuss topic, debate it and if necessary point out the weaknesses of other's arguments - that's not poo pooing opinion, it's developing a point and that on or in any forum is fair game. But so is supporting your allegations and he has not done that. You are both moderators and that should be an essential part of your understanding; it does not seem to be his, but is it yours?