It's parkinson

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Serious question - what is Parkinson's name please?
This will enable me to google him to see who he is and what he has done in his career
At this point I can honestly say that I know nothing about him
 
Serious question - what is Parkinson's name please?
This will enable me to google him to see who he is and what he has done in his career
At this point I can honestly say that I know nothing about him
You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf
Blind optimism is preferable to blind pessimism seeing as we're all in the dark about how any of the contenders would do.

Stendel might try to play attacking football and shipped four goals every game, just because it worked at Barnsley doesn't mean it'll work with our players. Pearson might turn up to the first game in an ostrich outfit and run round the pitch pecking at the opposition when they score.

I didn't want Parkinson but we weren't far off with Ross and maybe he'll get enough out of them with a fresh perspective to sneak us up the table.
Sorry but results against teams other than real easy beats showed we were a long way off.
2 wins in a meaningless cup games against teams of stiffs camoflaged a crock of cack. Draws against cellar dwellars. Easy wins for both Posh and Lincoln showed we were bloody awful.
 
Does anyone not believe that the press would be all over it of parkinson was taking training ?