It's parkinson

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I've no idea who he is but I had a very similar message from a long term RTG poster who I'll be seeing at Wycombe.

He has no reason to lie so someone is deliberate passing duff info.

As I've said I'll keep away from it all and just sit back, Donald should've had a Ross replacement lined up.

Tomorrow will be 3 days until matchday at Wycombe ...

... as things stand Fowler will be in the dug out <doh>

Do you think deliberate misinformation may be being leaked to try and track down the source of the leaks
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gil T Azell
Ah stats! Aren't they great

Point out where I said he was? I have never once said he's the man to "do what's required" - I'm saying I don't know having not seen ANYTHING of this football or games - but using "history shows a win percentage of" is utter rubbish - does that mean his win percentage will be the same with us? Allardyce had a win percentage of 30% with us I believe - a nlot would have him back in a heartbeat (not me mind) My "attack" is more based on the fact that Parkinson, who may or may not get the job, hasn't been announced and he's already in for an awful lot of stick from those not willing to give him a chance.

As I said, what if Stendel comes in, who seems to be the overwhelming fans favourite, and is awful? ships 3 or 4 every game and loses? Then what? The chairman does what the fans want, the manager the fans wanted doesn't work? Where does the blame lay at that point? The players? Who weren't to blame for the Jack Ross times?

Mate as I said I'm not expecting 'silky football' and my concerns are about his underwhelming record in all three lower leagues.

Three midtable seasons in L1 with Colchester followed by a promotion and a disastrous half season with Hull in the Championship.
The second half of the season relegating Charlton.
Two seasons in L1 with Charlton without promotion ending in a sacking.
Five seasons with Bradford taking them from L2 to L1 via the playoffs befot quitting for Bolton.
Then promoting Bolton to the Championship, and two relegation battles ending in relegation.

I'm not saying that he didn't have to fire fight at some of those clubs, I'm not saying he didn't achieve some difficult promotions and a league cup final on a shoe string.

But he's managed clubs without much expectations and quite rightly had success at the ones where he was given time and stability.

I'll back him if he comes, but we need promotion this season, and if Phil Parkinson long balls his way out of this league landing every second Sunderland touch on the head of Charlie Wyke I'll think:
"Fantastic! Needs must! We had to play this way to get out of L1".

Is we sign Ainsworth and our players connive and sh*thouse us out of the league by falling down in and around the box for free kicks and penalties from the training ground I'll go:
"Well, it wasn't that bad, and all the other teams are defensive as f*ck sh*thouses against us and they got a taste of their own medicine".

I'm a SAFC fan and I can be as 'one eyed' as Arsene Wenger when it comes to my club, but I don't see PP as the bloke to get us out of this league this season.

And yes, as much as you deride them, I don't think his overall stats point to a bloke who can quickly galvanise a team and get us the 70 points we need.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20191015_140852.jpg
    IMG_20191015_140852.jpg
    185.6 KB · Views: 11
Not great news but with no money what can you expect?

Out of the 4 'top runners' apart from Parkinson, Stendel and Pearson are without clubs and Ainsworth is Wycombe manager ffs.

None of them would cost much.

If he's penny pinching he shouldn't have bothered sacking Ross.
 
Out of the 4 'top runners' apart from Parkinson, Stendel and Pearson are without clubs and Ainsworth is Wycombe manager ffs.

None of them would cost much.

If he's penny pinching he shouldn't have bothered sacking Ross.
But it's an obvious money related appointment. Do you not think?
 
With no money ( that's obvious) how can we attract a decent manager?

Stendel is without a club and I can’t imagine he will command a bigger salary than Parkinson. If it’s back room staff that’s an issue and Parkinson is happy to go along with what we’ve got then that in itself is an equally bad decision.
 
With no money ( that's obvious) how can we attract a decent manager?

Stendel is without a club and I can’t imagine he will command a bigger salary than Parkinson. If it’s back room staff that’s an issue and Parkinson is happy to go along with what we’ve got then that in itself is an equally bad decision.
 
nothing wrong with a bag of Revels, apart from the raisin ones - they can **** off the horrible little sneaky look like a coffee one bastards



sorry, too much caffeine today <steam>
Aye but Parky is a Revel compared to a Thornton's (not Sean) type of manager.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chunksafc
Do you think deliberate misinformation may be being leaked to try and track down the source of the leaks

Said this a few pages back, but I thought it was more to get a feel for the reaction if he was appointed rather than to spot leaks. Either way, entirely plausible.