This thread aged well…
Why? Did we win from passing it around in dangerous areas? I genuinely haven’t seen the game or read anything yet.
This thread aged well…
I bow to your authority on the subject of all things Hull City.Is that 3 in 3 now for Oscar?
I bow to your authority on the subject of all things Hull City.
Why? Did we win from passing it around in dangerous areas? I genuinely haven’t seen the game or read anything yet.
Sacked and reinstated 3 times, by the cognoscenti on here...I've lost track, has Rosenior been sacked yet?
We played the same way we did when you posted this thread, just without the Ingram hospital pass.
If that’s the case then I will hold my hands up and say I was wrong. We didn’t play that way against Birmingham though as Ingram was launching when it came back to him instead (as I said he should). Not that I’m doubting anyone of course![]()
If only we could stop talking about this **** and just enjoy recent resultsTo be fair, the decision making on when to go short and when to go long, has been improving game on game.

there's nothing wrong with playing the ball shortTo be fair, the decision making on when to go short and when to go long, has been improving game on game.
there's nothing wrong with playing the ball short
what is wrong is after the goalkeeper plays the ball short the defenders keep playing the ball around in the penalty area until they are closed down and panic and make a bad pass
just keep playing it away from the danger area whether that is short or long
That's because some fans keep raising the straw man of making out sensible fans are complaining about playing the ball out from the back when in fact they are actually complaining about playing the ball around inside the penalty area until they panic.You may have mentioned this already...