Gas lighting in action
Why would Miles Leaburn or any of the other black players need a personal connection to Jamaica in order to show solidarity for the victims of the hurricane?
They do all have one obvious connection. An ethnic one.
The clear implication of the post to me was that Leaburn was somehow out of order to show how he felt about the hurricane disaster, if he was not from Jamaica himself. That this was another example of the 'wrong' policy of promoting diversity at CAFC.
That message was reinforced by another post saying Leaburn had likely never even been to Jamaica.
That was mockery.
I asked for the point of those posts to be explained to me, but my questions were ignored.
So I had to rely on my own judgment.
You started the thread in questionHis political views chime with yours as well.
I have said for a long time we should not have such matters on here, but even when they stray into football at times, @lardiman cant help himself.

Factually incorrect.I think it’s one of the threads you choose to look at and contribute to when the political views agree with your own.
Straight into victim mode.
No, I am saying that you are not suitable to Moderate a forum for a number of reasons, and I and others have put up with your whims and tried to work with you , but you refuse to listen.
As one of the three original posters on here , I m respectfully asking you to either stand aside , or leave. I think we have other posters who could do a better job.
You must log in or register to see images
I'm glad your previous post was not intended as a threat.
In my judgment the posts made regarding Miles Leaburn were racist in nature.
Before acting on that judgment I had asked three times for the point of the posts to be explained to me, so I could understand should there be a non-racist motivation that I had failed to grasp.
My questions were ignored.
I have long known that you think I am not a suitable person to moderate this forum.
For the record, I accepted the position after you left Not606 Charlton when you were the moderator.
Personally I don't care what you think of me.
If I read or see something posted by anybody which in my judgment crosses the line, and my requests for clarification are ignored, I will moderate as the situation requires.
It's too late to try to explain now. I've made the decision and I'm not going to reverse it.
I asked for clarification yesterday on the Paul Elliott thread and it was not given.
There you go again.
Having a dig at @ElfsborgAddick as well.
Who asked / told you to do this ?
Who voted for you ?
That is a bit heavy handed.
My thoughts are that Leaburn's connections to Jamaica are as strong as mine are to Wales, which is somewhere in my family tree in the past 100 years.I didn’t look at that thread and think it was racist. All Royston said was that he didn’t think Leaburn was Jamaican. Because Leaburn senior was from Lewisham.
Thanks for reminding me, I must put the oven on.Gas lighting in action
In the event of a change in leadership I vote for Pubes.Straight into victim mode.
No, I am saying that you are not suitable to Moderate a forum for a number of reasons, and I and others have put up with your whims and tried to work with you , but you refuse to listen.
As one of the three original posters on here , I m respectfully asking you to either stand aside , or leave. I think we have other posters who could do a better job.
I'm sorry you think that.
But when a situation arises that I believe may require moderating action, I am not going to play games.
I asked for those posts to be explained to me, so I could understand if there was a motivation for them that I had not understood.
They were not explained.
So I locked the thread.
It's all happening in sleepy OrpingtonOnline spats are sh1t. We've just lost a valued member of the allotment committee through one. A very minor issue which got magnified out of all proportion.
