No it isn't; Les Reed has been around since this supposed promise was made, and he'll have known the deal. It's not a verbal contract anyway; it's a promise, and it doesn't have terms. If Morgan's been keeping his head down playing for the past year, honouring his promise to commit to Saints for one more season, knowing that he's been allowed to move on to new pastures at the end of it, it's not like all knowledge of that info will have left with Cortese.
But the promise (if made) was under different circumstances...this isn't a kindergarten...he can't just lie on the floor kicking out, saying it's not fair.
Just noticed a similar discussion going on at another thread, "what is going on at the saints"
Me too. I'm going to merge these 2 threads. This one was first, so this will be the thread .
Edit: OK I've merged them the wrong way but let's live with it eh?
She may enjoy it, but does she enjoy it as much as pocketing hundreds of millions of pounds? Remember, she inherited this. She hasn't spent anything on it, and she didn't want it. She can sell high and make a fortune. If I wasn't into football and inherited a football club, that's sure as hell what I'd do. Wouldn't you?
Why does she bother to come to any game if she isn't interested?
She has PR advisors.
That said, any PR advisor who was managing the sale of a club would probably tell her not to go to the games (and she has gone to both home and away), and I'd certainly imagine they'd advise her against wearing a club scarf in the front row of the director's box. As did Ralph.
I don't think she's in any great rush to sell us, personally. However, as with several clubs, if someone comes along with a good offer - she'll think.
However, she does want a restructure. A more democratic board, a more open club with better engagement with its supporters (both sponsors and fans).
There's the continual upgrades to St. Mary's and Staplewood, and yes there is more still happening with Staplewood and more planned for the general upkeep of St. Mary's.
She has PR advisors.
That said, any PR advisor who was managing the sale of a club would probably tell her not to go to the games (and she has gone to both home and away), and I'd certainly imagine they'd advise her against wearing a club scarf in the front row of the director's box. As did Ralph.
I don't think she's in any great rush to sell us, personally. However, as with several clubs, if someone comes along with a good offer - she'll think.
However, she does want a restructure. A more democratic board, a more open club with better engagement with its supporters (both sponsors and fans).
There's the continual upgrades to St. Mary's and Staplewood, and yes there is more still happening with Staplewood and more planned for the general upkeep of St. Mary's.
What DTLW said, more or less.
Though we haven't had a game yet this season, now have we? Imagine if she's not there for the first home game...
.What DTLW said, more or less.
Though we haven't had a game yet this season, now have we? Imagine if she's not there for the first home game...

"Flog" is a dirty word. If she's going to sell I suspect she'll do it nicely. "Pass the torch" would be a more suitable term. No one would begrudge her for that.
Nope, not at all. But some suggested the day she strolled in that it was a matter of weeks until the club was passed on to the first person who would take it.
I don't think that'll be the case. She's very aware of what SFC means to her Dad and vice-versa, she'll want to 'pass the torch' to the right person.
'Pass the torch' is a good way to put it, actually.
Those people were pretty dim not to recognise the obvious fact that the club would probably be worth ten times as much in a couple of years time.
We are there now, though. There is now logic in it.