Au contraire Leon, whilst I happily tick many gammon boxes, I don't recognise myself in the xenophobic misanthrope to which you allude.
'Chav' is a lazy and shockingly-overused word, used mainly by social snobs many of whom are fur coat and no knickers themselves. I recommend Michael Collins' book 'The Likes of Us' to those interested in the demonisation of the type of people labelled 'chavs'.
Surely it is possible to question the wisdom of the police flying 'me too' trendy symbols ? Have we become so binary?
On the whole, a decent thread if it developed a little too much into a Connors - Borg base line rally type exchange.
We definitely need the new season to begin. The troops are tired of being confined to barracks and are starting to get fractious.
Of course, it’s right to question everything.
But, surely, the resounding issue of this discourse was of the group’s actions, not whether the police’s decision to fly the flag was ‘arbitrary’ or ‘official’ - which seemed to dominate the thread.
In my opinion, considering the police’s past history with LGBT groups and rights, they need to show that they now are inclusive of such, which, will surely help present a more just force.
Muslims were also shoehorned into this debate. Muslims are, as I’m sure you know, incredibly diverse. I’ve known Muslim men and women from different ethnicities holding various kinds of roles and professions with an obvious mix of views. A lot of the posts concerning Muslims came across as generalised stereotypical bullshit with a dubious underlying intent.
I also utterly condemn the use of the word chavs. But you see it used casually, everywhere, often without thought. It’s all part of demonising/blaming/scapegoating of certain peoples, pitting them against each other to keep them weak and divided.