Out of curiosity... when was the last time Slumberland took anything from Liverpool?
If you want to give your points on this board address our supporters and team correctly
Out of curiosity... when was the last time Slumberland took anything from Liverpool?
What's your ****ing problem like, you're not paying for this ......... start an interesting thread of your own if you don't like what's on here.
I'm just responding to ****e from non-Sunderland posters who come on here spouting nonsense, not to entertain the likes of you.
If you don't like it then show me, or them, where we're wrong.
What's your problem or do you think your posts are really entertaining & witty and not in the least bit boring![]()


Just noticed this
It still doesn't get around the fact that you're a tedious, pedant and a boring ****![]()


Cheers mate
What you miss is that I'm deliberately 'a tedious, pedant and a boring ****' when it suits me to be, I'll always ask people to stand by what they say no matter how many times they avoid the question.
Yeah it's boring & pedantic but the alternative is to allow people to talk **** and get away with it.
Like I said, if you don't like it, just ignore it, make a decent contribution to the topic or start another of your endless & witty non-football threads.
Your " Do you like girls with fluff on their pits?" was an all time comedy classic and not in the least bit boring
So, happy New Year to you and all the best for 2014.

You can't let anything go can you?
I have no idea about girls with armpit hair, enlighten me drearie

.I guess the rest of the City fans are all wrong too.
Do you ever win an argument, or just rant and wriggle until people die of sheer boredom?
Hardly definitive, but just one of a number of posts confirming it's about the name change, not the man as you wrongly claim.
http://www.not606.com/showthread.php/243273-quot-Assem-Allam-will-die-before-us-quot?p=5829411&viewfull=1#post5829411
Cheers mate
What you miss is that I'm deliberately 'a tedious, pedant and a boring ****' when it suits me to be, I'll always ask people to stand by what they say no matter how many times they avoid the question.
Yeah it's boring & pedantic but the alternative is to allow people to talk **** and get away with it.
Like I said, if you don't like it, just ignore it, make a decent contribution to the topic or start another of your endless & witty non-football threads.
Your " Do you like girls with fluff on their pits?" was an all time comedy classic and not in the least bit boring
So, happy New Year to you and all the best for 2014.


Errrr yeah, it's you yet again being boring and pedantic.
As I'm bored waiting for our lass to recover from last night's 'celebrations' I'll spare you a minute.
I responded to your wumming little Tiger pal, who posted nonsense about Sunderland, by posting nonsense about Hull ............ I wasn't expecting it to go to Crown Court.
I've no idea how many Hull supporters hate the owner and much less care, it was just an offhand backhander at some Hull idiot who knows nowt about Sunderland.
You claimed that most Hull supporters don't hate your owner ......... I have no way of proving they do and you have no way of proving they don't, we're both guessing.
To prove you're right you post 1 ridiculous thread with a handful of contributors including yourself and your little clique, some of whom want the thread locked.
To support your claim that Hull supporters don't hate the owner you post a thread with people singing about him dying
Let's make this clear for you, I've no idea how many Hull supporters hate the owner, some do some don't ............. no doubt you'll come back with more 'proof'.

Oh yes, membership of the group with a stated aim of being supportive of the chairman, and most others pointing out, it's not about the man, but the action, really doesn't pop a hole in your ridiculous claim does it. 
That was all you need to post.
Oh yes, membership of the group with a stated aim of being supportive of the chairman, and most others pointing out, it's not about the man, but the action, really doesn't pop a hole in your ridiculous claim does it.
As I said, not definitive, but it showed your claims were once again, ill-informed nonsense that you couldn't back up. You've quite a history of making such ridiculous claims and trying to imply a greater knowledge of teams than the people directly involved, I mean, our club morale has yet to fall as you claimed it would.
Unsurprisingly, you refuse to offer the same degree of 'proof' for your ridiculous claims as you try to ask for from others. Why not just face the fact you're often wrong? It'd be so more dignified than the wriggling and obfuscation the fools nobody but a few on here?

They weren't claims you clown .......... I just took the time to explain![]()
They were claims and you didn't explain despite being asked to. You just wriggled as usual.

I was responding to a wum claiming 'Sunderland were is disarray' ...... that's all the explanation it needs.
Just so you don't have another month-long tantrum let's say 'some' Hull supporters hate the owner, happy now?
If not perhaps you'd like to show me how it's done and prove that most Hull supporters don't hate the owner as you claim.
That's what you're claiming so prove it and stop wriggling.
Like some sulky turd squealing about 'flooding' our board as reprisal for being shown to be wrong, but showing himself to be a clueless tit in the process?. Tantrum..,Like some sulky turd squealing about 'flooding' our board as reprisal for being shown to be wrong, but showing himself to be a clueless tit in the process?.
That answer is just more example of your wriggling like a spoiled child when challenged.
You made ridiculous claims that you can't support.
You can't support them because you're wrong.
You've got it wrong because others no more about the goings on at their club than you.
It's no good squirming and trying to shift the burden onto others, you made the daft claims, they're yours to prove.

Prove that 'most Hull supporters don't hate the owner' and show me how it's done
As I've said they weren't claims, it was an offhand response to one of your little chums ........
Not much of a tiger like, ggrrrrrrrrrrrr
You must log in or register to see images
