Howe Out

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Interesting comments from Alan Pardew, he was onsite around the club this week for the Liverpool game and he said that he didn’t recognise one face from his time here, but that those he spoke with are absolutely focused on results, being top 6 and winning something. He reckons that the pressure is already on Howe, never mind building, and that he doesn’t think Howe is particularly safe.
 
Delusional Full Stop said:
One question.

If Howe has already been backed to the maximum that we are allowed…

where was the reported £70M coming from to buy Guelhi (sp) in the summer?

Seems to me that we had £70M to spend and haven’t. So, if we had £70M to spend and didn’t then he hasn’t been backed to the maximum possible.

Just a thought.

:)
Click to expand...
Don’t let facts get in the way
 
Delusional Full Stop said:
One question.

If Howe has already been backed to the maximum that we are allowed…

where was the reported £70M coming from to buy Guelhi (sp) in the summer?

Seems to me that we had £70M to spend and haven’t. So, if we had £70M to spend and didn’t then he hasn’t been backed to the maximum possible.

Just a thought.

:)
Click to expand...


Easy to answer though! They backed the manager and tried to buy a player the manager wanted and couldn't get him ....they couldn't afford him. One reason why is because the manager has already had massive amounts of money.

It's also like I've said backing the manager by not selling players he wanted to keep.

The club and owners have backed Eddie Howe by spending the maximum about possible... to suggest this manager hasn't been backed is selective and preposterous.

Darran eales “We can’t always do it in one window,” Eales said, seemingly referencing the summer. “We’ll have natural ebbs and flows.”
 
Last edited:
Roy! said:
Easy to answer! They tried to buy a player the manager wanted and couldn't get him....they couldn't afford him. One reason why is because the manager has already had massive amounts of money.

It's also like I've said backing the manager by not selling players he wanted to keep.

The club and owners have backed Eddie Howe by spending the maximum about possible... to suggest this manager hasn't been backed is selective and preposterous.

Darran eales “We can’t always do it in one window,” Eales said, seemingly referencing the summer. “We’ll have natural ebbs and flows.”
Click to expand...
<laugh>
 
Delusional Full Stop said:
<laugh>
Click to expand...

The club has backed this manager to the maximum amount available under PSR regulations. Saying he hasn't been backed in one or two windows is selective .. the full picture needed.

Darran eales “We can’t always do it in one window,” Eales said, seemingly referencingthe summer. “We’ll have natural ebbs and flows.”

“We have an ownership that will commit – and we are very fortunate – the maximum available under PSR regulations. It’s about how you spend that and you can’t always do it in one window. Sometimes it ebbs and flows because of the financial three-year cycle

now that you've wrapped yourself up in your own cocoon?

I don't recall you all crying out that Steve Bruce wasn't back in his last summer window. In fact you spent every week shouting about how much money he had overall .....but but he had more money than rafa ! Remember?
 
Last edited:
Roland Deschain said:
Interesting comments from Alan Pardew, he was onsite around the club this week for the Liverpool game and he said that he didn’t recognise one face from his time here, but that those he spoke with are absolutely focused on results, being top 6 and winning something. He reckons that the pressure is already on Howe, never mind building, and that he doesn’t think Howe is particularly safe.
Click to expand...

Alan Pardew blazed quite the trail after he left us - worst record of all 92 league clubs in a calendar year at Palace, got an established West Brom team relegated, sacked after 8 games at Den Haag, then sacked after 7 games at Sofia.

Funny that he didn't recognise a single face here, the club was a shambles when he was here, we've got rid of the useless clowns since then. He was one useless clown who left of his own accord.
 
Charlie Dogscock said:
Alan Pardew blazed quite the trail after he left us - worst record of all 92 league clubs in a calendar year at Palace, got an established West Brom team relegated, sacked after 8 games at Den Haag, then sacked after 7 games at Sofia.

Funny that he didn't recognise a single face here, the club was a shambles when he was here, we've got rid of the useless clowns since then. He was one useless clown who left of his own accord.
Click to expand...


Pardew finished 5th on buttons and the fans just never wanted him from day 1.

The best anyone did under Mike Ashley by miles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Welshie
Roy! said:
Pardew finished 5th on buttons and the fans just never wanted him from day 1.

The best anyone did under Mike Ashley by miles.
Click to expand...

Well of course it was.....but he was hardly up against stiff competition in Carver, McClaren, Kinnear, Bruce etc. Plus the gulf between other teams and us was far wider when Rafa came in.

And then after having this good team that finished 5th, Pardew then managed in by not having the balls to keep Ba on the wing and thus having Cisse go to ****, Cabaye being sold, Colo wasting away, and not controlling Ben Arfa.

And that's before you get on to the head butting, shagging players wives, ref shoving, worst record of all 92 league clubs at Palace, mangling West Brom, calling Essien a rapist, Pellingrini an old ****, being sacked after 8 games and 7 games.....Pardew is a ****ing comedy show.
 
Charlie Dogscock said:
Well of course it was.....but he was hardly up against stiff competition in Carver, McClaren, Kinnear, Bruce etc. Plus the gulf between other teams and us was far wider when Rafa came in.

And then after having this good team that finished 5th, Pardew then managed in by not having the balls to keep Ba on the wing and thus having Cisse go to ****, Cabaye being sold, Colo wasting away, and not controlling Ben Arfa.

And that's before you get on to the head butting, shagging players wives, ref shoving, worst record of all 92 league clubs at Palace, mangling West Brom, calling Essien a rapist, Pellingrini an old ****, being sacked after 8 games and 7 games.....Pardew is a ****ing comedy show.
Click to expand...


He finished 5th competing against the rest of the managers in the Premier league. He deserved credit for that.

Now he really wasn't backed the following summer! They sold all the best players and bought garbage.... was he cut any slack.? No
 
Roy! said:
The club has backed this manager to the maximum amount available under PSR regulations. Saying he hasn't been backed in one or two windows is selective .. the full picture needed.

Darran eales “We can’t always do it in one window,” Eales said, seemingly referencingthe summer. “We’ll have natural ebbs and flows.”

“We have an ownership that will commit – and we are very fortunate – the maximum available under PSR regulations. It’s about how you spend that and you can’t always do it in one window. Sometimes it ebbs and flows because of the financial three-year cycle

now that you've wrapped yourself up in your own cocoon?

I don't recall you all crying out that Steve Bruce wasn't back in his last summer window. In fact you spent every week shouting about how much money he had overall .....but but he had more money than rafa ! Remember?
Click to expand...
Stop living in the past. Bruce is history and is no longer relevant.

If we were going to spend a reported £60-£70M on a player in the summer and didn’t, then obviously we haven’t backed the manager to the maximum amount possible.

That was the only point I was making.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie290761
Charlie Dogscock said:
Rumours are ****e created by newspapers to make gossip and sell papers.

If we discussed all of them it would be a never ending conversation of horseshit.
Click to expand...
Bearing in mind a few of you have been continually gone around in circles arguing about Howe Out and this was a rumor about Howe Out I thought it was rather apt for this thread and discussion.

Back to you all going round in circles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Welshie
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back