You keep contradicting yourself. Spending needs to be maintained to progress. You can’t just add on past spends and average it ffs get a grip. Last winter actually was zero and I said almost zero over the last two consecutive windows which isn’t selective it’s the actual last two windows. Great to keep the stars but to progress you have to add to them, that’s backing to succeed not to stand still or more likely go backwards. 2 wins in 11 is selective wumming in a season of 18. What about your own point of viewing the whole season hmmmmm? Contradictory again
There no contradiction you just want to argue a separate point entirely. He's had all the money available and more. Again you are being selective looking at 2 windows and not all of them collectively...
You said you have to continue to spend. We haven’t in two consecutive windows but you say that doesn’t matter. Which is it? Because they are total opposites. When the two windows are consecutive it doesn’t help that continuation to invest so it’s not selective it’s totally relevant. 11 games from 18 isn’t especially from someone claiming a whole season needs to be looked at
There see a separate argument. At no point have I said money isn't required. The money wasn't available though because he'd already had it. Again already covered the rest 2. Like I say let's just say 4th,7th and 13th so far with only 2 wins in their last 11.. it shouldn't bother you it's just facts.
You said he’d been backed, in the last two consecutive windows he hasn’t. You say yourself the backing has to be continuous Lost on that as well as the rest Facts, 8 in 18 from the whole season you claim is so important don’t let the fact spoil your contradictory wumming
He has been backed and I actually never said backing has to be continuous. It will be and has been continuous though... it's just the fact he's already had everything that was available.
Nailing jelly to the wall isn't impossible..........You just need to put some thought into it and change things up a bit
You said to progress you have to continue to spend. We haven’t for him. He hasn’t been continuously backed. Two years ago is no good. The fact that there might not have been anything available is irrelevant. If you are backed you are backed, if you aren’t you aren’t regardless of the reasons for it
How can it have been continuous if it hasn’t always happened, that isn’t continuous which school did you go to?
He's had money throughout his tenure and also not selling key players is backing. He's been backed to the maximum value possible and that has been continuous.
Stories going around that there is no money to spend in Jan. Someone somewhere is talking a massive massive load of ****e. The maths just doesn't ****ing add up. Really wondering if their deliberately taking the piss for a massive splurge in the summer.
Good the manager shouldn't need money to improve on 13th. If anything it suggests the club is planning beyond Howe.
Well someone on Twitter has said that EH will be gone at the end if the season so possibly this ties in
One question. If Howe has already been backed to the maximum that we are allowed… where was the reported £70M coming from to buy Guelhi (sp) in the summer? Seems to me that we had £70M to spend and haven’t. So, if we had £70M to spend and didn’t then he hasn’t been backed to the maximum possible. Just a thought.
