How many more times guys?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
taffthefish said:
Dilli, the reason for the ban is valid because no one knows if it is a lie. Also because it was on the BBC 606 board there was no reason for anyone to discuss it, ancient news.
There is no agenda to get Swans banned on the Cardiff board, that is your insecurities surfacing.
All this thread did not start with Hughes, he's banned from this board and hasn't posted here!
When you were told to f off you were winding folk up so please spare me the indignation-

I cannot believe this thread and KJs bile on here is being blamed on JH! You cannot make this stuff up.
Click to expand...


Rubbish, we know its a lie he was caught red handed.

Aincent news is us nearly going bust donkeys years ago but it doesn't stop your lot bring it up, so that's another one up in flames

I wasn't winding anyone up, it's just that bob and Sparkey got on their high horses and you did nothing about it. I'm glad that you've acknowledged that I was fold to **** off and you stood by and did nothing to enforce your own board rules. I'm even more pleased that its on a thread that both supermods have been contributing on and will see it for themselves.

No agenda you say, Bean was calling for just about every one of ours to be banned, he did it even more than Hughs. When Hughs was banned people like bob and Sparkey were just itching to get ours banned too so don't even go there.

I choose not to post on your board because of the double standards and because of vile posters like Hughs. Run your board as you see fit but don't come on here telling us what to do
 
Dilligaf said:
Rubbish, we know its a lie he was caught red handed.

Aincent news is us nearly going bust donkeys years ago but it doesn't stop your lot bring it up, so that's another one up in flames

I wasn't winding anyone up, it's just that bob and Sparkey got on their high horses and you did nothing about it. I'm glad that you've acknowledged that I was fold to **** off and you stood by and did nothing to enforce your own board rules. I'm even more pleased that its on a thread that both supermods have been contributing on and will see it for themselves.

No agenda you say, Bean was calling for just about every one of ours to be banned, he did it even more than Hughs. When Hughs was banned people like bob and Sparkey were just itching to get ours banned too so don't even go there.

I choose not to post on your board because of the double standards and because of vile posters like Hughs. Run your board as you see fit but don't come on here telling us what to do
Click to expand...

Ok point made now leave it or I'll tell everybody that you drink shandies at matches !
 
Poshminx said:
:D .... looks like a threesome then .... now where did I put my whip <devil>
Click to expand...


I'm better looking than him. FFS is the bloke on the southern comfort advert, the fat ugly bastard walking down the beach ;)

I look like John Travolta........ When he's pissed. Perhaps John Revolting might be more accurate <whistle>
 
Knackeredjack said:
If that's your assessment then so be it. Be interested to know why though. Is it becasue I gave Musty both barrels when out of the blue he waded in with name calling and has an agenda against Chico? Or maybe it's because I support Dai's right to have an opinion that doesn't conform with the majority?

Either way, your opinion of me doesn't matter to anyone does it? Certainly not to me. Room for all opinions here. Or that should be the case.<ok>
Click to expand...

if that was both barrels bring it on, was like a limp slap on the wrist. iggy me pls kj, you are not worth the energy
 
taffthefish said:
KJ you were originally banned for comments made about a post related to JHs girlfriend and her battle with cancer, calling JH a liar. This apparently was in the old bbc606 site, I can't recall who else received a temp ban at the time. I have explained this to you. Folks thought I was harsh but I dealt with it as I saw fit at the time.
You then went to brb about the ban and then you also posted under another account on the Cardiff board and brb banned that account as well. Not sure if you were being stupid or arrogant but you shot yourself in the foot.
Click to expand...

agree with kj here that was all bullcrap
 
Dilli: "I choose not to post on your board because of the double standards and because of vile posters like Hughs. Run your board as you see fit but don't come on here telling us what to do"

Ditto <applause>
 
Musty, Perhaps because you and uplands were also temporarily banned.
Dilli, there is a difference between commenting about an institution and marking a person out for abuse.

You believe JH to be a liar but cannot prove he is not lieing in this instance. Maybe a cry wolf scenario but the temp bans were issued due to the fact it was commenting on a thread from another forum, the root content and at the time JH was not actively posting and had toned down his comments.

So let common sense prevail shall we, all those temp bans have since been lifted and are in the past, yes I will support my own and you may feel aggrieved if you think I have been harsh but I believe my actions since have proven I can take a more balanced view, not perfect but more balanced.
 
Not entirely sure if all that is correct Taff, you banned me a for joke and labelled it as libel... Yet I didn't actually accuse anybody of anything. A thread was created about what someone would ask a footballer, I wrote "Dave Jones, how old did you really think she was?"

That is not libel.
 
ProjectVRD said:
Not entirely sure if all that is correct Taff, you banned me a for joke and labelled it as libel... Yet I didn't actually accuse anybody of anything. A thread was created about what someone would ask a footballer, I wrote "Dave Jones, how old did you really think she was?"

That is not libel.
Click to expand...

Glad you think so, perhaps you run that by Dave Jones' legal team.
 
For asking a question? They wouldn't get passed the first letter, although they wouldn't even write it because of that reason. Be honest, the ban requests were because your guys cannot take a joke about former managers and are gunning for every jack <laugh>
 
ProjectVRD said:
For asking a question? They wouldn't get passed the first letter, although they wouldn't even write it because of that reason. Be honest, the ban requests were because your guys cannot take a joke about former managers and are gunning for every jack <laugh>
Click to expand...

I am not qualified to comment on the legalities but given the case was thrown out your comment could be deemed libellous and certainly in poor taste.

I have just requested the ban be lifted, now do't be so naughty.
 
taffthefish said:
I am not qualified to comment on the legalities but given the case was thrown out your comment could be deemed libellous and certainly in poor taste.

I have just requested the ban be lifted, now do't be so naughty.
Click to expand...

No probs, I just hope you know me enough to know it was in jest and I cannot promise there will not be more sometime in the future... On any board ;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back