With regards to Martial (sorry for naming names but I think it's clear who people are referring to when they're ambiguous and I don't wish to skirt around the issue), I think it's clear that he always has to have the last word. The problem arises when you get two or more people enter a thread with the same mentality and keep on firing the same point back at each other with mounting anger until one of them eventually crosses a line.
Just make your point and leave it there. If he disagrees let him, no one's going to argue with themselves and the thread will eventually slip off the bottom of the page.
When you get a conversation along the lines of:
I think Button's a better driver than in 09.
I don't think he is.
He is.
He isn't.
Interspersed with sarcastic comments and calls for the thread to be closed from other users I don't think you can pin the blame all on one user.
I've highlighted the relevant bit to what I am about to say.
That is exactly what I did! It was the response to my comment that was personally objectionable! That is why it needed to be moderated early. This is what is causing trouble in the forum. It is not the disagreement itself, as I keep saying! It is the patronising, condescending, rude response that is both provocative and inflammatory. And it is that which is the problem not the disagreement!
