HCST Statement - Hull City Supporters Committee

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Isn't Bobbi Hadgraph one of the stand reps or was she only on the new badge committee? She has just been voted on as a director of the HSCT, if she is one of the stand reps, how does that play out with the Allam's I wonder?
 
What were the outputs and/or action points from the last meeting? Has it all happened or not? If no satisfactory level of implementation has been achieved I fear that all attendees are simply puppets to the Allams being able to defend their position of sharing, and working with supporter groups...well some, given the trusts exclusion!
Well they haven’t done a couple of things they’d agreed
They haven’t put the stand reps email addresses on the website as far as I can see
And more importantly they haven’t changed the bloody website address.
 
Well they haven’t done a couple of things they’d agreed
They haven’t put the stand reps email addresses on the website as far as I can see
And more importantly they haven’t changed the bloody website address.
The website domain is a classic example of the Allam blame-throwing bunker mentality.

The club fixated on getting a domain name that they are fully aware is owned and used by someone extremely unlikely to hand it over for free.

The club then launched a pretty unpleasant and snarky twitter campaign blaming the domain owner for a lack of progress, while surreptitiously buying hullcity.co.uk and not using it.

I believe that is termed a ****’s trick.
 
The website domain is a classic example of the Allam blame-throwing bunker mentality.

The club fixated on getting a domain name that they are fully aware is owned and used by someone extremely unlikely to hand it over for free.

The club then launched a pretty unpleasant and snarky twitter campaign blaming the domain owner for a lack of progress, while surreptitiously buying hullcity.co.uk and not using it.

I believe that is termed a ****’s trick.

HullCityAfc.com is available for $1595 outright purchase....
 
Isn't Bobbi Hadgraph one of the stand reps or was she only on the new badge committee? She has just been voted on as a director of the HSCT, if she is one of the stand reps, how does that play out with the Allam's I wonder?

That the girl that did a really cringey match report video for Sky Sports a few weeks back? Yeah she was on the badge board.
 
Or the club at [email protected]

Appeasement won't work with this lot. I can't believe so many are still falling for this. You're allowing them to string you along.

Doubt any of us are falling for it. Those going and “representing” are probably the last of the few happy clappers. Thinking they’re making a difference by licking the club’s backside.
 
The website domain is a classic example of the Allam blame-throwing bunker mentality.

The club fixated on getting a domain name that they are fully aware is owned and used by someone extremely unlikely to hand it over for free.

The club then launched a pretty unpleasant and snarky twitter campaign blaming the domain owner for a lack of progress, while surreptitiously buying hullcity.co.uk and not using it.

I believe that is termed a ****’s trick.

Assuming you mean hullcity.com it redirects to the supporters trust which is a nice touch .
 
FEZ is that you?

No, it's not, balkan tiger.

Although the foolishness and futility of giving these meetings oxygen is all too clear. My view has never changed.

What does confuse me is why the content, hypocrisy and manipulation of the owner organised meetings is quite rightly highlighted constantly, by so many frequent posters, yet they seem to want to support those same meetings. The Trust are entitled to attend, but it is not essential that they do. It never has been.

Just an observation.
 
No, it's not, balkan tiger.

Although the foolishness and futility of giving these meetings oxygen is all too clear. My view has never changed.

What does confuse me is why the content, hypocrisy and manipulation of the owner organised meetings is quite rightly highlighted constantly, by so many frequent posters, yet they seem to want to support those same meetings. The Trust are entitled to attend, but it is not essential that they do. It never has been.

Just an observation.

Good to know you're still around.
 
No, it's not, balkan tiger.

Although the foolishness and futility of giving these meetings oxygen is all too clear. My view has never changed.

What does confuse me is why the content, hypocrisy and manipulation of the owner organised meetings is quite rightly highlighted constantly, by so many frequent posters, yet they seem to want to support those same meetings. The Trust are entitled to attend, but it is not essential that they do. It never has been.

Just an observation.
Good to know you’re still around Fez
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton