The article itself says
Not that I'm saying Harry is Mr Clean, but this article doesn't prove any wrongdoing on his part. If that's the best they can dig up on Harry then they're pretty poor investigative journalists.
So, over the course of this weeks investigation, how many people have they found to have actually done something wrong? I count the assistant head-coach of Barnsley, who took a £5,000 bribe, but that one doesn't make for great headlines I guess.
The rest of it is just greedy idiots being entrapped into saying that they might be prepared to associate with the sort of scumbag agents that they really shouldn't be anywhere near. So what? Everyone knows that there's dodgy deals going on with all the money floating around in the game, just as everyone knew there were dodgy deals going on with brown envelopes in motorway service stations 30 years ago.
If the FA and other governing bodies really wanted to do something then they'd be going after the agents who are the root cause of most of these problems, and putting much tighter rules on their role in the game. They ban third-party ownership but they're quite ok with people getting paid 10% of £100m transfer fees for doing practically nothing. Agents should be dealing with player's contracts, image rights, advertsing deals, etc. They should not be getting paid for transfers.
