Greta Thunberg

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hoddle Is A God said:
What a shambolic ****witted post!

The YouTube stuff is merely to help those with a genuine interest in this topic ease themselves into the facts, ideas, movers and shakers, etc. The stuff put out by the Thunderbolts Project provides good summaries of the science and experimental work currently being undertaken in this field.

In fact, a very recent (this month) podcast highlighted some of the results of the SAFIRE team, which has managed to replicate many of the features found in and around the Sun, in the laboratory, using replicable principles of plasma physics,

The early pioneers of this type of work are scientists and engineers such as Birkeland, Alfen and Jurgens, and you can readily find their materials and papers out there in the scientific press. Most of this has been peer reviewed among plasma scientists.

The mathematicians who rule modern cosmology won’t peer review it, because (a) they do not understand electricity or plasma physics, (b) the experimental nature of the puts their own nonsensical and pathetic modelling techniques to utter shame, and (c) the ramifications in what EU Theory posits would put the mainstream out of lucrative jobs over night.

It is ironic that you accuse EU scientists as having no evidence when, not only is the opposite true, but it is the mainstream that has no evidence. Not one scientist has been able to produce a shred of evidence to substantiate Eddington’s Victorian model for the workings of stars. Instead, every time they have discovered an anomaly (in the Standard Model), they have hamfistedly created another model and simply tagged it onto the existing models.

There are as many models (not direct replicable experimental proof) of stars as there are types of stars. They do this in order to cling to the outdated thinking of Newton, and to perpetuate Einstein’s lies.

By contrast, EU Theory has one model that is backed up by actual scientists working in laboratories carrying out real classical science.
Click to expand...

Then you should have no problem providing recent links to their model in action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
PISKIE said:
Why is there no evidence of this cosmic event ? No physical records of massive stress to the planet, no evidence of mass migration or extinction due to the cataclysmic effects it would have had ?

Why are there no records whatsoever from the people who would have witnessed this event given its magnitude.

According to Velivosky, they simply chose to forget it because it was so traumatic.

Okay .......
Click to expand...
You obviously haven't read it either <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoddle is a god
Looney Leftie said:
Then you should have no problem providing recent links to their model in action.
Click to expand...

Go and search out the works of the SAFIRE team and laboratory experiments. It is very technical and extremely detailed.

If you are genuinely interested in learning more about this topic, you will invest the necessary time and effort.

Personally, I believe you lack the ability or the courage to do so.
 
Hoddle Is A God said:
Go and search out the works of the SAFIRE team and laboratory experiments. It is very technical and extremely detailed.

If you are genuinely interested in learning more about this topic, you will invest the necessary time and effort.

Personally, I believe you lack the ability or the courage to do so.
Click to expand...

Personal attacks because you don't have the information

Pitiful
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole
PISKIE said:
I haven’t read The wind in the Willows either, but I don’t need to to know it’s a work of fiction.
Click to expand...
The modern trait is to have an opinion and you have many. If you cannot be bothered to read the books then fair enough that's your choice and they are very heavy going but please don't expect your opinions to carry any weight. In a nutshell you have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Looney Leftie said:
Personal attacks because you don't have the information

Pitiful
Click to expand...

You are pathetic. It's a fact I am pointing out.

If you are technically minded and have a genuine interest in this subject, a decent place to start is with electric-cosmos.org

It provides a very good summary of Prof Don Scott's "electrical circuit" theory, and there are links to his peer reviewed papers. These papers provide scores of references to the other work carried out in the fields of electro magnetism and plasma physics.
 
Spurf said:
The modern trait is to have an opinion and you have many. If you cannot be bothered to read the books then fair enough that's your choice and they are very heavy going but please don't expect your opinions to carry any weight. In a nutshell you have no idea what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

To the contrary,
We are actively asking for recent evidence to support a claim, if all there is to prove it is a 60 year old book then I have every right to be sceptical.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Spurf said:
The modern trait is to have an opinion and you have many. If you cannot be bothered to read the books then fair enough that's your choice and they are very heavy going but please don't expect your opinions to carry any weight. In a nutshell you have no idea what you are talking about.
Click to expand...

Again, if anybody can provide any credible evidence to support his claims then I’m all ears.

As it is the scientific community have tested his theories and methodology shown them to be deeply flawed and thus his conclusions to be completely flawed too.

It makes no difference to anything whether you think my opinions carry any weight or not. The evidence is all that counts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Looney Leftie
PISKIE said:
Again, if anybody can provide any credible evidence to support his claims then I’m all ears.

As it is the scientific community have tested his theories and methodology shown them to be deeply flawed and thus his conclusions to be completely flawed too.

It makes no difference to anything whether you think my opinions carry any weight or not. The evidence is all that counts.
Click to expand...

www.safireproject.com
 
Hoddle Is A God said:
You are pathetic. It's a fact I am pointing out.

If you are technically minded and have a genuine interest in this subject, a decent place to start is with electric-cosmos.org

It provides a very good summary of Prof Don Scott's "electrical circuit" theory, and there are links to his peer reviewed papers. These papers provide scores of references to the other work carried out in the fields of electro magnetism and plasma physics.
Click to expand...

You think I'm not already researching ?

What I'm asking for is what information you have, so far I've been offered you tube and podcasts What you have shown me s so far is an inability to lay your hands on one piece of research.
 
Looney Leftie said:
You think I'm not already researching ?

What I'm asking for is what information you have, so far I've been offered you tube and podcasts What you have shown me s so far is an inability to lay your hands on one piece of research.
Click to expand...

No, I don't think you are "researching." I think you are taking the piss.

If you are genuinely interested in this subject and cannot be arsed, or don't know how to search the information for yourself, you will find links to numerous papers here:

www.electric-cosmos.org

www.safireproject.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back