Greta Thunberg

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Read Richard Milton's "Shattering The Myths of Darwinism" then come back and let's have a proper discussion on the subject.

You still don't get it, do you, Pixie?

You've been lied to all of your life, and they own your mind and your perception.

I knew it <laugh> So you don't believe that Dinosaurs inhabited the Earth before Humans then ?

You've admitted to being a climate denier, crackpot gardener physicist and now a Creationist and you want to have a 'proper' discussion ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Looney Leftie
I believe in climate change.

I think Greta is being poorly “managed” by her parents.

I think the abuse chucked at her by adults is appalling. Sick, bitter, mildly perverted individuals with inferiority complexes and small penises (Hartley-Brewer must have a penis).
 
Maybe we should hook up Greta and Matth.
She obviously cares about the environment a great deal, Matth works in a garden centre and cares for wasps. Thats environmental!
Made for each other....
Both love a rant too
 
Read Richard Milton's "Shattering The Myths of Darwinism" then come back and let's have a proper discussion on the subject.

You still don't get it, do you, Pixie?

You've been lied to all of your life, and they own your mind and your perception.

The less-than-three page Preface that begins the 1997 version of this book sets the tone for the constant contradictions and misstatements which fill the rest of the pages.

Milton claims that his first edition of the book was misunderstood. Here he states his view that he doesn't think science is a myth, that evolution is false, and that natural selection is a pack of lies. He also says, on the very next page, that he doesn't think the earth is only a few thousand years old. The previous sentence says that he does not accept there being any significant evidence for natural selection. And a couple of sentences later we find out that he has no idea how old the earth is. We later find out that he thinks there is significant evidence that the earth is only a few thousand years old.

Milton's statements appear confusing, unclear, and two faced in just the first few pages. But the real confusion is yet to come......

http://www.2think.org/darwinism.shtml
 
Read Richard Milton's "Shattering The Myths of Darwinism" then come back and let's have a proper discussion on the subject.

You still don't get it, do you, Pixie?

You've been lied to all of your life, and they own your mind and your perception.

If I've got this right you think the views of a sci-fi writer outweigh all the current peer reviewed scientific research into inheritance, genetics and natural selection, carbon dating and many other fields related to evolution.

What's your view on contrails?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archers Road
They've moved to GC Saf Orchid <ok>
Called it a long time ago, GC is not the right place for Saxton.

I know Little Si was unhappy that the old politics thread wasn't divisive or racist enough so he had to start a new one but I think he's done the big fella a disservice by dragging him there. They'll end up tearing him to shreds! :biggrin:
 
I knew it <laugh> So you don't believe that Dinosaurs inhabited the Earth before Humans then ?

You've admitted to being a climate denier, crackpot gardener physicist and now a Creationist and you want to have a 'proper' discussion ?

Can't believe even HIAG is stupid enough to believe in that discredited pseudoscientific codswallop. Richard Milton <laugh><laugh><laugh><laugh>
 
If I've got this right you think the views of a sci-fi writer outweigh all the current peer reviewed scientific research into inheritance, genetics and natural selection, carbon dating and many other fields related to evolution.

What's your view on contrails?

Don’t encourage him mate. HIAG is of the view that the tested and peer reviewed science is only perpetuated to keep lying scientists in their jobs.

Instead he puts his faith in sci-fi writers and Gardeners turned have-a-go physicists whose work has been widely debunked for the complete tosh that it is.

He won’t have any of it though. He’s bought into the gullible claptrap that the established science is trying to suppress the nonsense he’s fallen for, because they don’t want the truth being released. It’s classic conspiracy thinking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole
Just being looking up this Richard Milton guy.......he claims that Roman's never existed, the whole story of the Roman empire is made up, and that no one ever spoke Latin either, it was made up by 18th Century school masters to keep their jobs.
Seems like a complete and total ****** <laugh>
FFS HIAG, why would you admit to swallowing this ****. I thought you were just slightly autistic, now I am leaning towards total ******ation.
 
Just being looking up this Richard Milton guy.......he claims that Roman's never existed, the whole story of the Roman empire is made up, and that no one ever spoke Latin either, it was made up by 18th Century school masters to keep their jobs.
Seems like a complete and total ******
<laugh>
FFS HIAG, why would you admit to swallowing this ****. I thought you were just slightly autistic, now I am leaning towards total ******ation.

<laugh><laugh><laugh>
 
Status
Not open for further replies.