Gordon Armstrong

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
thank you for taking the time out to reply, as said earlier smug pushed an argument to me that went 3 threads because i replied to RTB with his copy and paste of his own words.
i let it drop but he posted a nasty note to me on that very French thread a day later, i responded then i find out Gorden had banned posters without even warning them only protected smug words, deleted and merged posts of nasty words smug had said, so the evidence to prove they are lies has gone. These are not the actions a mod should have taken, he never once steps in on an argument if smugs involved. I want this to end but find the culprits not men enough to admit what they did

And there was me thinking it was a simple misunderstanding :emoticon-0102-bigsm
Should have known I'd get hold of the wrong end of the stick :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
Leave the thread open, maybe until a fact appears, not just opinions.
fact gordon banned posters who had not even commented on smugs thread and they were not even told
fact they were not banned from any other thread only his
fact smug insulted posters and was warned to reel his neck in by the site mod
fact its only smug who keeps hitting the report button when he starts arguments over 20 times we have been told
fact lots of posters have left the board because of him which GA will confirm if he grows a pair
fact Gordon refused to intervene for the good of the site,
fact i tried to to quell the arguments which a lot of posters can attest too only to be scoffed by smug saying who made you site policeman
fact gordon deleted posts and merge some which he admits to so his besties nastiness can be hidden from scrutiny he has proven form for this.

i rest my case
 
And there was me thinking it was a simple misunderstanding :emoticon-0102-bigsm
Should have known I'd get hold of the wrong end of the stick :emoticon-0102-bigsm
mate you have been on this board a while now i'm not aggressive to people unless they are to me, i have never been banned ,never pressed the report button, and never tried to get a poster banned,as he did with vinegar joe, i have never been warned by the site mod for my conduct, and have never been banned like smug, he is big on accusations, though most are what he has done, the point of this thread was to shed light on the underhanded tricks being pulled, just have a look at the take over thread i was very rarely there, but all the banns of the many that came there were from arguments smug started and Gordon banned
 
  • Like
Reactions: farnboromackem
fact gordon banned posters who had not even commented on smugs thread and they were not even told
fact they were not banned from any other thread only his
fact smug insulted posters and was warned to reel his neck in by the site mod
fact its only smug who keeps hitting the report button when he starts arguments over 20 times we have been told
fact lots of posters have left the board because of him which GA will confirm if he grows a pair
fact Gordon refused to intervene for the good of the site,
fact i tried to to quell the arguments which a lot of posters can attest too only to be scoffed by smug saying who made you site policeman
fact gordon deleted posts and merge some which he admits to so his besties nastiness can be hidden from scrutiny he has proven form for this.

i rest my case

1. Good, I agree with his reasoning.
2. Pointless distinction
3. Insult, get a warning. Not just smug
4. Really??? Corroboration?
5. Lots of posters who came to this board to provoke him left in a huff when they found this site tends not to tolerate wums, and rightly so. Context.
6. Gordon didn't behave the way you wanted him to, you mean.
7. You butted in & it didn't go how you hoped?
8. Deleting/merging is his job, the rest is your opinion.

Anyone can state opinions as facts,
I rest my case.
In fact, I'm going to bed, I'll rest my entire luggage.
 
1. Good, I agree with his reasoning.
2. Pointless distinction
3. Insult, get a warning. Not just smug
4. Really??? Corroboration?
5. Lots of posters who came to this board to provoke him left in a huff when they found this site tends not to tolerate wums, and rightly so. Context.
6. Gordon didn't behave the way you wanted him to, you mean.
7. You butted in & it didn't go how you hoped?
8. Deleting/merging is his job, the rest is your opinion.

Anyone can state opinions as facts,
I rest my case.
In fact, I'm going to bed, I'll rest my entire luggage.
and the difference is those are your opinions and you are entitled to them and i won't swear at you or argue with you for having them
 
Its quite sad how this board has gone over the last 18 months or so. I've been on here when it was the BBC 606 and we didn't have Sunderland fans determined to derail threads with posts they know will disrupt. Yes we had the occasional moron from other clubs, but they were swatted away. I'm really not sure what people get out of doing this, I can assume, their own life is so bereft of anything meaningful that they come one here to disrupt in a weird way of gaining attention. Sad, but thats how I see it. Also, I am not in any clique or take sides with anyone, I say it as I see it and for me Gordon is top draw, he lets some of these idiots go so far before pulling the plug...to me thats what he's there to do and he does it well. This is supposed to be a bit of fun, something to enjoy....be really good if we could get back to that.
 
Its quite sad how this board has gone over the last 18 months or so. I've been on here when it was the BBC 606 and we didn't have Sunderland fans determined to derail threads with posts they know will disrupt. Yes we had the occasional moron from other clubs, but they were swatted away. I'm really not sure what people get out of doing this, I can assume, their own life is so bereft of anything meaningful that they come one here to disrupt in a weird way of gaining attention. Sad, but thats how I see it. Also, I am not in any clique or take sides with anyone, I say it as I see it and for me Gordon is top draw, he lets some of these idiots go so far before pulling the plug...to me thats what he's there to do and he does it well. This is supposed to be a bit of fun, something to enjoy....be really good if we could get back to that.
I think the biggest problem is certain posters have issues with each other and no matter which one posts or comments the other criticises it, I also realise it's hard when some people put stupid comments no to reply, that's not me saying other people's opinions are stupid as everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
I'll give you an example after the Charlton game someone comments that's it ,we are ****ing **** , screwed are chances , no way of automatic promotion and we were definitely in the play offs. Then the same person was shouting exactly the same during the Wigan game, the bit I don't get from that was why were they so bothered that we got beat off Wigan when they had already stated we could not get automatic.
I don't normally reply to **** stuff like that but I can understand why others do
 
It's alright though, Flanders 'cos we've all (hopefully) 'moved on' so it'll calm down now :emoticon-0105-wink:

I'll now close the thread, as requested by the o.p. but I'll not delete it . . . . I'll leave it as an example of how nonsensical some discussions can be. It'll move as new threads are created, and be nigh on forgotten about in time, by most.

It's obvious to me that bees in bonnets can only create problems, therefore it's best if they're released :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
I was looking forward to wishing Smug well, but unfortunately my privileges got removed and it has now caused this. If anything it’s had the complete opposite effect.
We only have your word for that and no evidence to back it up. Guilty by prior activity! If that was what you were going to do, then you have now done it. But you surely, with the animosity which you and the others have shown to smug, understand our standing on this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.