1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Gnanalingham Style

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by QPR247, Jun 15, 2015.

  1. GoldhawkRoad

    GoldhawkRoad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    9,739
    Likes Received:
    3,387
    Losses, sure. My use of "profit" was probably wrong. But TF gets a commercial benefit from the QPR set up - his international air business connected to an English Championship, and sometimes Premier League, club. Hence he and his partners take the bulk of the losses.

    As for the Mittals, they seem to have little control and get little commercial benefit. They may do, of course, if the new stadium goes ahead. But it's not hard to understand why currently they don't want to bear too many of the operating losses, and certainly not pro-rata to their shareholdings
     
    #21
    UTRs likes this.
  2. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    30,855
    Likes Received:
    28,851
    You knew I was right all along, you sly old dog Goldie.
     
    #22
  3. GoldhawkRoad

    GoldhawkRoad Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2011
    Messages:
    9,739
    Likes Received:
    3,387
    Isn't that the way this board works? You come up with a proposition. There's a hell of an argument. Posters get heated, mods tear their hair out, Swords is nearly banned...and then we find you were right all along?!
     
    #23
    Hoops Eternal likes this.
  4. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    30,855
    Likes Received:
    28,851
    Impeccable reasoning sir, and it will save everyone a lot of time to take this on board sharpish.
     
    #24
    GoldhawkRoad and Hoops Eternal like this.

Share This Page