Gnanalingham Style

[GoldhawkRoad]

Sadly only a loss sharing arrangement at QPR!

You must log in or register to see media

Losses, sure. My use of "profit" was probably wrong. But TF gets a commercial benefit from the QPR set up - his international air business connected to an English Championship, and sometimes Premier League, club. Hence he and his partners take the bulk of the losses.

As for the Mittals, they seem to have little control and get little commercial benefit. They may do, of course, if the new stadium goes ahead. But it's not hard to understand why currently they don't want to bear too many of the operating losses, and certainly not pro-rata to their shareholdings

 

[sb_73]

Losses, sure. My use of "profit" was probably wrong. But TF gets a commercial benefit from the QPR set up - his international air business connected to an English Championship, and sometimes Premier League, club. Hence he and his partners take the bulk of the losses.

As for the Mittals, they seem to have little control and get little commercial benefit. They may do, of course, if the new stadium goes ahead. But it's not hard to understand why currently they don't want to bear too many of the operating losses, and certainly not pro-rata to their shareholdings

You knew I was right all along, you sly old dog Goldie.

 

[GoldhawkRoad]

You knew I was right all along, you sly old dog Goldie.

Isn't that the way this board works? You come up with a proposition. There's a hell of an argument. Posters get heated, mods tear their hair out, Swords is nearly banned...and then we find you were right all along?!

 

[sb_73]

Isn't that the way this board works? You come up with a proposition. There's a hell of an argument. Posters get heated, mods tear their hair out, Swords is nearly banned...and then we find you were right all along?!

Impeccable reasoning sir, and it will save everyone a lot of time to take this on board sharpish.