Giggs

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
ninian opinion

ninian opinion

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2011
13,443
9,375
113
The jury surely must have doubts if they’ve been out for 2 days now.

Any reasonable doubts will be enough.
However they may have already decided the verdict on some of the charges?

7 women on the jury - that can swing both ways.
 
It could be argued that by the time it next comes to court he will have had a 2 year sentence, having lost his Wales job and become unemployable in the mean time.

I read the reports during the case and having heard both sides it was tough to tell who was telling the whole truth. Aspects of both were believable and other aspects not so. Proof was not clear for what he was charged with.

He wasn't in court for being a serial shagger. If he had been then guilty would have been the only conclusion.

I can see why the jury couldn't reach a verdict and unless there is any new, conclusive evidence will it be any different next year?

In addition if the barristers strike continues for any length of time July 2023 will not be achievable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: clingo
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back