That's a lot of waffle to ignore the fact that decision making is opinion based and therefore people are still going to disagree with many decisions. You think just because it's instant and an explanation is thrown up that people will go "oh okay, fair enough"? They won't.
You say inaccuracy and error as if these are things which can be measured infallibly and are either right or wrong. There's very few consensus penalties and red cards and people are split on the majority.
Your argument basically seems to be cos it's instant people won't care if they're wronged and won't feel hard done by which is fantasy world.
Know what else is instant btw? A ref blowing his whistle without some nonce 70 miles away watching it again dozens of times while stroking themselves to a picture of Mark Clattenberg.
You seem to think that whoever programs this AI won't include their biases too. Deluded.
I also work with AI on a day to day basis btw.