Leicester City have, along with other current PL clubs, celebrated centenaries in recent years. For at least 80% of your existence, you’ve had exactly the same opportunities as those who you constantly whine about. It’s really not Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool etc. fault that you’ve not capitalised on this.Got no problem with it - if your club has the money then feel free - but linking that ability to spend to distinct financial parameters that favour those clubs that have already built commercial empires rather than somply - can your owners afford it? ... is just anti-competitive ... and contradicts how the big clubs evolved historically ...
It's also a bit if a cosy, sepia- coloured myth, that United have always built organically for their periods of success ... Dennis Law was a British transfer record at the time - likewise Andy Cole and Rio Ferdinand ... all 3 were instrumental in hugely successful periods for the club - Angel di Mario, not so much! ... but still a British transfer record![]()
Leicester City have, along with other current PL clubs, celebrated centenaries in recent years. For at least 80% of your existence, you’ve had exactly the same opportunities as those who you constantly whine about. It’s really not Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool etc. fault that you’ve not capitalised on this.

Oh yeah, I’ve just read up about it.They have actually.
It was Jimmy Hill who campaigned successfully to get rid of them.
Like I said, footballers will still be minted, it's not as if the cap would be at a couple of grand a week.
Leicester City have, along with other current PL clubs, celebrated centenaries in recent years. For at least 80% of your existence, you’ve had exactly the same opportunities as those who you constantly whine about. It’s really not Utd, Arsenal, Liverpool etc. fault that you’ve not capitalised on this.
... yes mate - Leicester is the same size as London, Liverpool and Manchester 
Correct.
Yeah but, but, but what about Denis Law, what about Rio Ferdinand, it's not fair.![]()
You need to make your mind up mate…one minute it’s wealthy owners, now it’s populations... yes mate - Leicester is the same size as London, Liverpool and Manchester
... and the only ****ers whining about clubs spending ... are the fans of those clubs that have spent the most historically... and now you...

... yes mate - Leicester is the same size as London, Liverpool and Manchester
... and the only ****ers whining about clubs spending ... are the fans of those clubs that have spent the most historically... and now you...
You need to make your mind up mate…one minute it’s wealthy owners, now it’s populations![]()
Fosse is actually right.

No mate - it's simply equal opportunities... and entertainment - if Chelsea and Citeh hadn't got minted, we'd have very likely had the same two clubs that dominated the 80s and 90s winning everything until now - apart from the glorious 2015-16 season of course - which is precisely why it is the fans of those clubs who whinge the most at the success of the new kids on the block ...
Up until recently, it has been equal opportunities, which is the point I’m making.No mate - it's simply equal opportunities... and entertainment - if Chelsea and Citeh hadn't got minted, we'd have very likely had the same two clubs that dominated the 80s and 90s winning everything until now - apart from the glorious 2015-16 season of course - which is precisely why it is the fans of those clubs who whinge the most at the success of the new kids on the block ...
if only Leicester were forward thinking. Building on their past successes as other big sides did.

Up until recently, it has been equal opportunities, which is the point I’m making.