Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
I’m like this too. I’m definitely less interested and enthusiastic than I used to be as I really dislike what modern football has become. However I still check for news, transfers and scores etc all the time like a junkie looking for their next fix

You feel this way because Spurs are ****ing **** mate <laugh>
 
Wenger proposing a rule change to the offside law which will benefit the attacker. It’s being trialled in Sweden. I’m all for it.


Wenger explained: "You will be not offside if any part of the body that can score a goal is in line with the last defender, even if other parts of the attacker body are in front."
 
Wenger proposing a rule change to the offside law which will benefit the attacker. It’s being trialled in Sweden. I’m all for it.


Wenger explained: "You will be not offside if any part of the body that can score a goal is in line with the last defender, even if other parts of the attacker body are in front."
I gotta ask the question, which part of the body can't score a goal apart from the hands?
 
Wenger proposing a rule change to the offside law which will benefit the attacker. It’s being trialled in Sweden. I’m all for it.


Wenger explained: "You will be not offside if any part of the body that can score a goal is in line with the last defender, even if other parts of the attacker body are in front."

Does that mean our refs can stop using 5 minutes looking at pixels to see if someone is "offside"
 

Then idgaf.

That **** is ridiculous and killing the game. Using that length of time on a decision is beyond tedious when you're there to be entertained.

Next, a forensics team will run onto the pitch and check sweat particles around the player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Wenger proposing a rule change to the offside law which will benefit the attacker. It’s being trialled in Sweden. I’m all for it.


Wenger explained: "You will be not offside if any part of the body that can score a goal is in line with the last defender, even if other parts of the attacker body are in front."

Isn't that what the original offside rule was

There are a couple of parts of the body that would be painful to score a goal from
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saf and Diego
Isn't that what the original offside rule was

There are a couple of parts of the body that would be painful to score a goal from
The original rule/term was "seeking to gain unfair advantage" (see Alan Clark from Leeds for details).
The rediculouse situation we have today means players who are faster of thought/reaction or wear bigger boots are ruled offside because their big toe nail is ahead of a defender when a pass is made.

It was meant to stop the old habit of "GOAL HANGING" ffs.
 
The original rule/term was "seeking to gain unfair advantage" (see Alan Clark from Leeds for details).
The rediculouse situation we have today means players who are faster of thought/reaction or wear bigger boots are ruled offside because their big toe nail is ahead of a defender when a pass is made.

It was meant to stop the old habit of "GOAL HANGING" ffs.

Yeah I thought the old rule was 'clear daylight' between last man and goal scorer, which makes sense.

This whole notion that if the attacker's left shoulder is 2 inches ahead of the defender in the build up then the goal is chalked off is ****ing ridiculous

Unless it chalks off one of Richarlison's and he gets booked for celebrating a goal that doesn't count lol

That's a great spelling of ridiculous above too <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego
Yeah I thought the old rule was 'clear daylight' between last man and goal scorer, which makes sense.
Definitely makes sense, but wasn't well enforced IIRC. Was really hit and miss.

An introduction of it nowadays, with the tech involved to aid a decision, should be an improvement.
 
Definitely makes sense, but wasn't well enforced IIRC. Was really hit and miss.

An introduction of it nowadays, with the tech involved to aid a decision, should be an improvement.

Yeah there used to be some shockers (to be fair there still are with VAR)

But as you say, using the tech to see whether there's clear daylight should be a lot quicker than the endless drawing lines ****e
 
  • Like
Reactions: FadgewackeR