I've been looking round the Prem boards on here, and I'm shocked how normalised it has become when Liverpool commit a cynical foul like that. VAR didn't even look at it, even the supporters think that sort of challenge is just accepted, it's clear TV money is either buying the refs or the FA, it's blatant cheating, I don't know of any other team that would get away with that sort of challenge.
I wrote on here about this a few years ago, speculating about the potential behind the scenes influence of the multi million pound documentaries that are becoming the norm. I said it at the time Amazon were making one about us. The presence of camera crews and infiltration of a retail behemoth was apparently deeply concerning to Poch and one of the core reasons everything collapsed for him in the end.
At the end of the day, these corporations have more money than they know what to do with, more legal and political clout than is healthy and have no interest in producing good football. They want good TV, that's it. Mourinho's arrival at Spurs was an absolute gold mine for them.
Would it really surprise anyone if in X years from now a panorama exposed not outright bribery but certainly not so subtle lobbying and pressure on officials and others involved in the game to do anything necessary to create more of a spectacle, less of a sport?
I've worn this tin foil hat since Mark "look at me everyone" Clattenburg openly admitted to reffing the Spurs v Chelsea game in a way that would hand Leicester the title but through the most dramatic collapse possible on the part of Spurs. Am I blaming him for us losing the league title? Of course not. But do I hold him responsible for allowing the game to get so out of hand that 2 of our players picked up injuries and Dembele received a 6 match ban for poking Costa in the eye (i.e. the ban Mane DIDN'T receive against Everton); a ban that led to our slow start the following season which in turn led to us again missing out on the title? Yes, I blame him directly.
The 'Liverpool Quadruple' narrative is absolute TV gold and it wouldn't surprise me if certain conversations have taken place in certain quiet corridors to remove as many obstacles as possible from its path. Nothing obvious, just subtle things like allowing constant cynical fouls and never sending players off. Notice how Robertson's foul on Emerson in the home fixture went to VAR who upgraded it to a red, yet Fabinho's assault on Son doesn't even get a review. You have to wonder why. What has changed apart from the plausibility of an historic quadruple?
And for all the arguments that Pool 'deserve' it; yes - they probably do. I've praised them and Klopp's work to the skies on here. But that is what makes sport so addictive. Sometimes what is 'deserved' doesn't end up happening. Sometimes the unexpected or unpredicted happens and things turn out differently.
And it is this unpredictability that is steadily draining from the sport. Most of Europe's top leagues are a cake walk for usually one, sometimes two teams. PSG fans were so underwhelmed by their recent title victory that they even staged a walkout with 15mins still to play and boycotted the full time celebrations. That is madness and tells you all you need to know. So in the absence of true competition, drama needs to be created through other means. You still get it in the CL, as epitomised this past week, but domestically there isn't much left to get excited about.