Whippersnapper?I wonder what Dean Smith said? Something beginning with the letter W...

It’s not though, I knew that wasn’t offside when it happened, as Mings controlled and moved the ball deliberatelyWhat a bullshit interpretation from the Premier League. ****ing nonsense.
He came back onside then won the ball didn’t he? Can’t see what the argument is
Only he’s run 10 yards to take the ball off him lol.If he wasn't offside he's not there to win the tackle.
Mental, and this is the problem when you try and make an imperfect game have perfect and to the letter rules.
He came back onside then won the ball didn’t he? Can’t see what the argument is
That's the difference between someone kicking it and trying to control it, though.Had this a few seasons ago when Lovren swiped at a ball and deflected it through to an offside Harry Kane, who was in turn then fouled for a pen (which he missed). If he jumps over the ball and lets it through, Kane is offside, as is Rhodri in this case. That is surely not right, but it is the rules.
Only he’s run 10 yards to take the ball off him lol.
If he wasn't offside he's not there to win the tackle.
Mental, and this is the problem when you try and make an imperfect game have perfect and to the letter rules.
He's gaining an advantage because of the position he is in: but as soon as Mings deliberately plays the ball, he's onside. But if Mings doesn't play it, Rhodri nicks the ball and City go on to score Mings will be crucified for not playing to the whistle. It's the rules, but I personally think it stinks.