Picked by one person pikey. I agreed with the BBC’s verdict so for me the MoTM was Kante.
Yes, the person who decides on the official man of the match.
Picked by one person pikey. I agreed with the BBC’s verdict so for me the MoTM was Kante.
Official means zip, I saw the game and Kante was man of the match for me. EOS.Yes, the person who decides on the official man of the match.
Official means zip, I saw the game and Kante was man of the match for me. EOS.
Looks like snowflake and Les having nibble.You must log in or register to see images
Ginge and Kante
Haven’t you got any dead horse you should be selling?You’d have made a great barrister.
Haven’t you got any dead horse you should be selling?
Looks like snowflake and Les having nibble.
Or is it a coincidence that you’re just thick as ****?Is it a coincidence your posts make less sense as it gets later?
Try two planksThick **** is so much more difficult to deal with than is thin ****.
Or is it a coincidence that you’re just thick as ****?
No your horse is dead, it was one mans view as was SKY’s, BBC, ESPN, BENIN, FOX and many others chose Kante. We can’t all be wrong along with your dead horse.You’re trying to argue that Kante was man of the match in the FA Cup final when it says on the FA website it was someone else. My horse is alive and well.
No your horse is dead, it was one mans view as was SKY’s, BBC, ESPN, BENIN, FOX and many others chose Kante. We can’t all be wrong along with your dead horse.
Official is as inconsequential as you pikey.None of which decided the official man of the match.
The dopey **** could start an argument in an empty caravan.Thick **** is so much more difficult to deal with than is thin ****.
The dopey **** could start an argument in an empty caravan.
It’s not an error because all views on a game are subjective, hence why so many Sports outlets voted for Kante as opposed to one person the FA paid to do the same.I’m not starting an argument, Ginge. Just correcting your obvious error as your posts get increasingly bizarre.