That's from this board Sucky
Actually just realised that the post @SuckMyKlopp quoted was about 9 posts before his on this exact thread
Match Day Thread General matchday thread.
- Thread starter Libby
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Actually just realised that the post @SuckMyKlopp quoted was about 9 posts before his on this exact thread
KKK meeting?What was the score last night, I was out
I take it you're all concerned about my wellbeing by the amount of tags I'm getting?
Appreciate it. I'm fine and well xx
Appreciate it. I'm fine and well xx
@Skylarker was acting like they'd signed the next Rio Ferdinand cos the fluffer scored a derby winner.
I think you'll find that I've said a number of times adding one CB isn't enough. Until Klopp buys a GK not a lot will change.
Do I think VVD is a great defender? Yes I do. But he won't solve our issues alone. It's not 5 a side ffs
smk's random thread report #68
This week we have something never seen before for you, a spurs fan bitching about not being a .....you guessed it....
"media darling"
"damn those pesky elite clubs"
Said one eye witness.
Shocking scenes!
Just in a few exchanges here we are seeing the
blatant bias of the so-called "pundits" .
Wanted to argue the toss about having video review when :
1. The clubs involved are not their darlings
2. When they believed that having it would have
resulted in a game ending to the benefit of their
darlings.
but too thick to have realised the above implicitly means ...
3. The club involved is one of your darlings and a
CORRECT decision goes AGAINST them.
The review process will get quicker.
The decision communication process with the crowd
will get better.
The "pundit" excuses as to why VAR should now not
actually be used, will not.
This week we have something never seen before for you, a spurs fan bitching about not being a .....you guessed it....
"media darling"
"damn those pesky elite clubs"
Said one eye witness.
Shocking scenes!
Just in a few exchanges here we are seeing the
blatant bias of the so-called "pundits" .
Wanted to argue the toss about having video review when :
1. The clubs involved are not their darlings
2. When they believed that having it would have
resulted in a game ending to the benefit of their
darlings.
but too thick to have realised the above implicitly means ...
3. The club involved is one of your darlings and a
CORRECT decision goes AGAINST them.
The review process will get quicker.
The decision communication process with the crowd
will get better.
The "pundit" excuses as to why VAR should now not
actually be used, will not.
Massive vagina of the week award going to ......
Hiag
for outstanding work in tagging me on the wum and then crying about my reply... Well done @Hoddle Is A God well done. Mate.
Hiag
for outstanding work in tagging me on the wum and then crying about my reply... Well done @Hoddle Is A God well done. Mate.Nice of you to turn up mate and Yes yes Hilaryous.
Yes, but you need to leave the "prem board" **** on the Prem board. I'm avoiding that board for a reason, mate.
On this board, I'm not HIlary, or Ballsack, or Quentin, or any of the other bollocks that's spouted on that board, Here, I'm HIAG (or Hoddle Is A God).
We play it straight on this board. Discussion Not Insults. That's the law here, mate.
Ok I apologise, I never realised you were that delicate.
Zappacosta the latest Chelsea player to act like a massive ****ing tart over next to nothing.
Massive vagina of the week award going to ......
Hiag
smk's random thread report #68
This week we have something never seen before for you, a spurs fan bitching about not being a .....you guessed it....
"media darling"
"damn those pesky elite clubs"
Said one eye witness.
Shocking scenes!
Just in a few exchanges here we are seeing the
blatant bias of the so-called "pundits" .
Wanted to argue the toss about having video review when :
1. The clubs involved are not their darlings
2. When they believed that having it would have
resulted in a game ending to the benefit of their
darlings.
but too thick to have realised the above implicitly means ...
3. The club involved is one of your darlings and a
CORRECT decision goes AGAINST them.
The review process will get quicker.
The decision communication process with the crowd
will get better.
The "pundit" excuses as to why VAR should now not
actually be used, will not.
Who you hoping to get in the next round Sucky?
Personally I just used the same one that made sense.
I think you'll find that I've said a number of times adding one CB isn't enough. Until Klopp buys a GK not a lot will change.
Do I think VVD is a great defender? Yes I do. But he won't solve our issues alone. It's not 5 a side ffs
Until you learn to defend collectively, as a unit, not a lot will change.
One of the best teams in the league, with the ball. ****ing Keystone Cops without it
