The game can basically be summed as thus : Chelsea and City are fake clubs who would be Championship teams without their respsective sugar daddies![]()
You must log in or register to see images
The game can basically be summed as thus : Chelsea and City are fake clubs who would be Championship teams without their respsective sugar daddies![]()
The game can basically be summed as thus : Chelsea and City are fake clubs who would be Championship teams without their respsective sugar daddies![]()
Or has one in Kroenke.Shots fired by the boy who wants a sugar daddy in charge.....![]()
Shots fired by the boy who wants a sugar daddy in charge.....![]()
Blanks fired by the boy who's copied the same BS line that the other Chav tookVery magnanimous of you (not taking the piss) but after spending £380m in 16 months they ought to be good.Well played City, their pressing game was superb and and a fantastic goal from de brunyne. They already have the smack of champions about them.
Very magnanimous of you (not taking the piss) but after spending £380m in 16 months they ought to be good.
If they do not win the title and at least one cup and get to at least the CL semi finals it will be a clusterfuck of a season imho.
The Pep is a genius band wagon is a joke.
Anyone spending. £170m while also having Aguero, Silva and kompany at the club yet wins **** all ain't all that (that was super pep last season)...his great genuis was to spend a further £210m this summer. They then had the ****ing nerve to bitch avout Arsenal not selling Sanchez to them...Hope they win **** all again.

Shots fired by the boy who wants a sugar daddy in charge.....![]()
Pep is buying the league pure and simple and for the sake of football I hope they fail.
Blanks fired by the boy who's copied the same BS line that the other Chav took
you said it. you'd prefer a russian sugar daddy over the existing sugar daddy![]()
you said it. you'd prefer a russian sugar daddy over the existing sugar daddy![]()
Pixie would prefer a sugar daddy who spent money on the club rather than a cowboy fantasy wonderland.
Amen, brother!
But the same applies to both Chavs and United.
Of the three plastic clubs, I'd rather City win it.
United at least earnt money through big attendances and winning trophies in the late 1970s and 80s and early 1990s. Before Abramovic chelsea won at least 1 Fa cup, a league cup and I think a cup winners cup during the 1990s...city hadnt won **** all since the mid 1970s before they were bought.
The season before they were bought they set a record for the least amount of goals scored at home in a season (think it was 10). City have built nothing. Chelsea had built a team from 1994 ish onwards city were just **** and built **** all...they just bought any one they wanted and imho it has put a fews nails in my love of football

United at least earnt money through big attendances and winning trophies in the late 1970s and 80s and early 1990s. Before Abramovic chelsea won at least 1 Fa cup, a league cup and I think a cup winners cup during the 1990s...city hadnt won **** all since the mid 1970s before they were bought.
The season before they were bought they set a record for the least amount of goals scored at home in a season (think it was 10). City have built nothing. Chelsea had built a team from 1994 ish onwards city were just **** and built **** all...they just bought any one they wanted and imho it has put a fews nails in my love of football

What trophies in "1970's and 80's"?
1 2nd Division Winners and 4 FA Cups?
![]()
Didn't Chelsea win the Autoglass trophy before they became a 'big club' after Roman bailed them out ?
There was an FA Cup in 1977 ... can't remember who they beat though![]()
