Match Day Thread General matchday thread.

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Brazil v Germany starting now at the Olympics.
 
Is Kane to City actually happening or is it internet bullshit?

I'll be surprised if it happens, I just can't think of why they would want him, how he works in the Spurs team is not how it's going to work in the City team. Look at the problems Mourhino encountered. I just think from a City perpsective the idea is bonkers, even more bonkers when I saw the price tag. £160M for a guy that's not won a trophy* is just laughable.

Disclaimer, except for golden boots*
 
Is Kane to City actually happening or is it internet bullshit?
According to yesterday's Mirror, City have "warned spurs they won't be held to ransome" over the fee for Kane and they won't pay over £100m.
Today the Mirror online say "they won't forced" to pay more than £120m.

They are richer than God.
They have spent over £860m since Pep took over...so stop the ****ing whining and cough up ffs...tight ****s
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
According to yesterday's Mirror, City have "warned spurs they won't be held to ransome" over the fee for Kane and they won't pay over £100m.
Today the Mirror online say "they won't forced" to pay more than £120m.

They are richer than God.
They have spent over £860m since Pep took over...so stop the ****ing whining and cough up ffs...tight ****s
They have never paid more than £65M ish for any player and i doubt they are going anywhere near doubling that for a static striker who will **** their game up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
According to yesterday's Mirror, City have "warned spurs they won't be held to ransome" over the fee for Kane and they won't pay over £100m.
Today the Mirror online say "they won't forced" to pay more than £120m.

They are richer than God.
They have spent over £860m since Pep took over...so stop the ****ing whining and cough up ffs...tight ****s

From a Spurs perspective I can see why you need the cash, but if I was a City supporter I'd be telling you on yer bike. Honestly, I wouldn't even offer £90M for the guy, only one man falls in that price bracket and he plays for Barcelona.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Welshie
According to yesterday's Mirror, City have "warned spurs they won't be held to ransome" over the fee for Kane and they won't pay over £100m.
Today the Mirror online say "they won't forced" to pay more than £120m.

They are richer than God.
They have spent over £860m since Pep took over...so stop the ****ing whining and cough up ffs...tight ****s

The issue is, Pep is obsessed with his legacy, and that legacy is dependent on people believing his bullshit.

Since week one, hes said City cannot spend whatever they want. Its a complete fabrication, but if he wants it to be slightly true he cant go and spend 160m on someone.
 
From a Spurs perspective I can see why you need the cash, but if I was a City supporter I'd be telling you on yer bike. Honestly, I wouldn't even offer £90M for the guy, only one man falls in that price bracket and he plays for Barcelona.

I agree. But you gotta add about 60m cos hes English
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb and Sucky
The issue is, Pep is obsessed with his legacy, and that legacy is dependent on people believing his bullshit.

Since week one, hes said City cannot spend whatever they want. Its a complete fabrication, but if he wants it to be slightly true he cant go and spend 160m on someone.
Pep when he says city cant afford 160m
You must log in or register to see images