RAWK is not good, too many crazy ****ers. Didn't read that though as I can imagine how it goes.

I think you'd be surprised.
Basically NUFC's ownership has driven RAWK to want LFC to form an alliance with United, which tbf I never thought I'd see on there![]()

Ten haag picking fights with varane now?
Mans like a master of making enemies![]()
Dunno, do you.
This looks like one of my scrabble hands.
So you cheat at scrabble then - yeahThis looks like one of my scrabble hands.

So you cheat at scrabble then - yeah
What a tw@ lol
![]()
Yeah I adopt the old nonchalant word that doesn't exist technique regularly.


Trebs backs tin haag.No sooner after Ratcliffe buys in United that United start targetting Nice defender Todibo!
What a total shock![]()
No sooner after Ratcliffe buys in United that United start targetting Nice defender Todibo!
What a total shock![]()
I was more alluding to the fact that INEOS also owns Nice, so United will now have the pick of their best players,
Did they not vote against that type of carry on the other day?I was more alluding to the fact that INEOS also owns Nice, so United will now have the pick of their best players,
Thats just loan deals between clubs with the same ownership.Did they not vote against that type of carry on the other day?
True enough but even that could be exploited ie buying a player from an associated club for buttons so as to keep below FFPThats just loan deals between clubs with the same ownership.
Doesnt count for perma transfers.
And I think its just for this coming January window, not for ever.
EDIT: And I just checked, even that vote failed. Needed a majority of 14 for it to pass, and only 13 voted for it, 7 clubs voted against it