General Matchday Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Diego said:
You seem to have added £100m to most peoples assessments there, are you talking net or gross?

Edit....I wouldn't worry about Rooney's wages if I were you, he is on less than some Liverpool players :emoticon-0100-smile
Click to expand...

Gross. Koeman isn't responsible for Everton pulling in £50m for Stones or £75m for Lukaku. He probably cost Everton £25m+ with his mishandling of the Barkley contract ultimatum situation too.

Rooney is only on less than Coutinho, who was valued the 2nd most expensive footballer in the world last window.
 
astro said:
Gross. Koeman isn't responsible for Everton pulling in £50m for Stones or £75m for Lukaku. He probably cost Everton £25m+ with his mishandling of the Barkley contract ultimatum situation too.

Rooney is only on less than Coutinho, who was valued the 2nd most expensive footballer in the world last window.
Click to expand...
<laugh> by who, Liverpool? <laugh> <laugh> <laugh>

What has Klopp spent (gross)?
 
astro said:
Gross. Koeman isn't responsible for Everton pulling in £50m for Stones or £75m for Lukaku. He probably cost Everton £25m+ with his mishandling of the Barkley contract ultimatum situation too.

Rooney is only on less than Coutinho, who was valued the 2nd most expensive footballer in the world last window.
Click to expand...

Everton have spent £220+m under Koeman?
 
Another pile of **** yesterday. Disjointed, poorly organised, gaping holes at the back, poor tactical changes, meh.

Left after their 3rd went in, and if it wasn't for Pickford it could have been 10.

Frustrating as **** to watch. Cracking early goal from Rooney, but then we just gradually backed off, getting deeper and deeper and the equaliser was completely inevitable. The 2nd was as obvious as **** I was screaming for some knacker to pick up Ozil, as you could see what was going to happen, but we just ran across our hapless backline and got ahead of a CB to head in, Ozil heading in ffs. <doh>

He's got to go today ffs, give Unsworth the reigns for Weds.
 
astro said:
Which one spent a quarter of a billion pounds?
Click to expand...
Does it make a difference apart from you wanting to Wum?
Statistically as you like them Klopp is worse than Rodgers as Liverpool boss...The main point he is worse FACT
That doest make Rodgers any good for LFC as he had the boot

Thats the problem with you lot always comparing to old gobbing up history you dont gob up that Rodgers was better than Klopp though you just ask for threads to be closed not to hurt your feelings lol
 
astro said:
He promised to keep your stars. Immediately sold them off for £50m-£75m and bought £25m replacements.
Click to expand...
He's not sold any of our top players who didn't want to leave, and he's spent way more than we've got back in. So your 'asset stripper' bollocks sort of dies there....
 
Tobes said:
He's not sold any of our top players who didn't want to leave, and he's spent way more than we've got back in. So your 'asset stripper' bollocks sort of dies there....
Click to expand...

He's spent nothing once you factor the low share price and new TV deal into the accounts.

Why do you think you have no striker? Because Moshiri refused to pay out in advance and was waiting for Barkley money to come in.
 
astro said:
He's spent nothing once you factor the low share price and new TV deal into the accounts.

Why do you think you have no striker? Because Moshiri refused to pay out in advance and was waiting for Barkley money to come in.
Click to expand...

He's put £80m onto the clubs balance sheet, you can **** off now <ok>
 
Tobes said:
He's put £80m onto the clubs balance sheet, you can **** off now <ok>
Click to expand...

And with a 50% share he gets £40m straight back.

Do you think the obscenely low price he paid for his shares and the new TV deal have increased his assets enough to cover the other £40m? Hint: yes they did.

BTW he's also getting you to buy him 50% of a £300m+ stadium.
 
astro said:
And with a 50% share he gets £40m straight back.

Do you think the obscenely low price he paid for his shares and the new TV deal have increased his assets enough to cover the other £40m? Hint: yes they did.

BTW he's also getting you to buy him 50% of a £300m+ stadium.
Click to expand...

It's been spent soft lad.

He was investing in the business.

If the club increases in value over time then that means we'll have improved both off and on the pitch. Do you think sat in the bottom 3 at the minute we'd fetch him a profit on his investment? Stupid boy.
 
Tobes said:
It's been spent soft lad.

He was investing in the business.

If the club increases in value over time then that means we'll have improved both off and on the pitch. Do you think sat in the bottom 3 at the minute we'd fetch him a profit on his investment? Stupid boy.
Click to expand...

He's mugging you blind. If I had the cash I'd gladly buy him out for what he's actually paid.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back