Off Topic General Election

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Winner?

  • Labour

  • Tory

  • Lib Dem

  • Reform

  • Green

  • The rest

Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does anyone know the main reason for 'Reform' naming themselves that way?
Is it because they want to change the trade deal with the EU? If so, then someone should remind them that Brexit means Brexit.
 
Gone For A Walk said:
Agree, it is quite an achievement from a standing start, so little time and funding, and smear campaign after smear campaign.
BUT so disappointing and plain wrong that 14/15% of the vote equates to only 4 seats (less than 1%).

-> She (P Maudant) was about the only front runner who came across as a human being, it's a shame she lost her seat.

Not only that, but also a capable politician and likely a capable leader. It is a shame imo. Their disaster continues! No idea who will be next leader once the (surely) inevitable happens later this morning.
Click to expand...

Smear campaign?

Ah, you mean the journalistic scrutiny every party is subject to.

I understand now.
 
Cityzen said:
Who? Were you ****ing over Diane Johnson and Emma Hardy? Dreams of a threesome after discussing getting your pothole fixed?
Click to expand...

I'm at the stage of my life where I'd do the threesome, irrespective of their politics and whether or not they could fix Steve's pothole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steverico
Cityzen said:
Yes, yesterday people like Brady Mk2 were being called Nazis because they had a different view to another person on some matters. I disagree with Brady on most things but don’t resort to calling people terms like that if they have a different view.
Click to expand...
Yes, banning the Muslim faith and sending them to the gulag is now an entirely acceptable view, and has no historical precedence whatsoever.

You've been very clear that you're anti-Muslim. Is this you doubling down?
 
Cityzen said:
I would. But not with those two.<laugh>
Click to expand...

Use a Stihl stone saw to cut a nice square, dig out the loose old asfalt, tamper down the gravel underneath, pour in some cold asfalt and use a Wacker to compress it down. Half an hour's work whilst the ladies are preparing themselves in the bedroom. To be honest, their looks are irrelevant, I'd happily do it for the experience.
 
Off The Line said:
Yes, banning the Muslim faith and sending them to the gulag is now an entirely acceptable view, and has no historical precedence whatsoever.

You've been very clear that you're anti-Muslim. Is this you doubling down?
Click to expand...

Ban every faith
 
Off The Line said:
Yes, banning the Muslim faith and sending them to the gulag is now an entirely acceptable view, and has no historical precedence whatsoever.

You've been very clear that you're anti-Muslim. Is this you doubling down?
Click to expand...
Any examples of this anti-muslim stance?
 
Off The Line said:
Yes, banning the Muslim faith and sending them to the gulag is now an entirely acceptable view, and has no historical precedence whatsoever.

You've been very clear that you're anti-Muslim. Is this you doubling down?
Click to expand...

The historical precedence of banning the Muslim faith, and every other one, and sending people to the gulag was what happened in the Soviet Union.
Any reason you are so pro Muslim? You despise our way of life? Think women’s are second class possessions of men? Anti alcohol? Would throw gays off the top of buildings?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newlandcasual2
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back