Off Topic General Election Special

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
With the scum wearing what appeared to be suicide vests the officers who shot them would have gone for head shots as opposed to central body mass.

Probably why they let off so many rounds.

Harder target.
 
That doesn't mean there's a shoot to kill policy. There's no policy on shooting any PM can influence. The policy is shoot to incapacitate. The decision to shoot is made by the individual officers. The must act within the law.

He spoke to both sides & facilitated the peace process, the information is available as are his comments regarding Hamas.

I think 50 rounds would incapacitate.
 
With the scum wearing what appeared to be suicide vests the officers who shot them would have gone for head shots as opposed to central body mass.

Probably why they let off so many rounds.

Harder target.

SAS larker one shots a dirty **** in Syria from 3 miles range.

Armed police fire 50 shots at point blank range.

We need more military, not police.
 
My 25 year old daughter has just told me she won't be voting.

Reason being she thinks they're all a bunch of liars and she doesn't trust any of them.

She's a nurse.

Did you ask the opening question on QT a few weeks back?
 
The final ICM polls are not looking too groovy for Corbyn, seems like the well off, middle-aged middle classes will be out in force protecting their lot whilst the youth will be crammed under Oak Road playing fields' hut drinking Hooch and ignoring it all.

Prove them wrong and vote!!!
 
That doesn't mean there's a shoot to kill policy. There's no policy on shooting any PM can influence. The policy is shoot to incapacitate. The decision to shoot is made by the individual officers. The must act within the law.

He spoke to both sides & facilitated the peace process, the information is available as are his comments regarding Hamas.

Don't you dare use facts to deviate from the Crosby narrative.
 
The final ICM polls are not looking too groovy for Corbyn, seems like the well off, middle-aged middle classes will be out in force protecting their lot whilst the youth will be crammed under Oak Road playing fields' hut drinking Hooch and ignoring it all.

Prove them wrong and vote!!!

Hooch!

They won't be touching a peasant drink like that.
 
The final ICM polls are not looking too groovy for Corbyn, seems like the well off, middle-aged middle classes will be out in force protecting their lot whilst the youth will be crammed under Oak Road playing fields' hut drinking Hooch and ignoring it all.

Prove them wrong and vote!!!

They've been pretty consistent throughout last couple of weeks. 10-12 point leads.
 
With the scum wearing what appeared to be suicide vests the officers who shot them would have gone for head shots as opposed to central body mass.

Probably why they let off so many rounds.

Harder target.

I wasn't being critical, I'm more than happy for them to shoot to kill.

I don't think they'd have handled it differently if there was no suicide vests, the Westminster attacker got the same treatment.
 
I wasn't being critical, I'm more than happy for them to shoot to kill.

I don't think they'd have handled it differently if there was no suicide vests, the Westminster attacker got the same treatment.

An innocent bystander got shot in the head, thankfully not fatally, but still completely unacceptable. The police really shouldn't be armed and in the case weapons are needed under no circumstances should they be fired when a hostage or any other innocent could get hit and absolutely shouldn't shoot to kill.

That's my take on it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.