Off Topic General Election Special

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
No, not really. The Tories' weak minority government will expose them in the Brexit negotiations, Corbyn will still be there with an increase in Labour MPs to rattle them and the government will fail to get **** all done in parliament. The Brexit deal will be so piss-poor people might actually start blaming the Tories instead of the European boogeyman in Brussels and the 'immigrunts takin' our jerrrbs'. All fun and games.

Do you get out much?
 
just not sure why anyone would be happy with those backwards folk joining up with tories
 
As far as I can see the only people to focus on Corbyn were the Tory gutter press, sadly they're 'read' by the gullible unwashed who'll believe any **** Rupert Murdoch prints.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
Are you talking about doing something different to pandering to their every need?

At this period of uncertainty with Brexit we should be pandering to their every need. We need them investing, building their businesses, spending and keeping everything flowing. They're not the backbone of our economy, they are our economy. We have this fabulous country and good quality of life because of them, not in spite of them. If we push and prod and poke until they take their ball home, we will have not chance of making Britain great again by ourselves. We'd be a third world country with no manufacturing and no income.
 
You don't think the Labour election campaign was centred around a brave new world under Corbyn?

Get to ****. <laugh>
No, as it simply wasn't

The Tories decided to make it about 'strong and stable' May, as they obviously chose to try and make it a presidential style election. Her language was always me and I, rather than us and the party. Unfortunately for the Tories they spectacularly ****ed up, as May ended up being viewed as the complete converse, a piss weak suit full of nothing who ran away from any form of discussion that didn't involve her reading a speech written by an aide. She's wooden, lacks charisma and their manifesto was full of holes.

Labours campaign was all about their manifesto combined with Corbyn being heard for once, as opposed to being demonisied by the far right rags
 
No, as it simply wasn't

The Tories decided to make it about 'strong and stable' May, as they obviously chose to try and make it a presidential style election. Her language was always me and I, rather than us and the party. Unfortunately for the Tories they spectacularly ****ed up, as May ended up being viewed as the complete converse, a piss weak suit full of nothing who ran away from any form of discussion that didn't involve her reading a speech written by an aide. She's wooden, lacks charisma and their manifesto was full of holes.

Labours campaign was all about their manifesto combined with Corbyn being heard for once, as opposed to being demonisied by the far right rags
But every expert has said labours figures just didn't add up! It's so easy to offer the people what they want when you're the opposition! But even you must admit when asked about figures they just crumbled! Even corbyn scratching at his iPad and we won't even mention RUSS ABBOT <doh>
 
At this period of uncertainty with Brexit we should be pandering to their every need. We need them investing, building their businesses, spending and keeping everything flowing. They're not the backbone of our economy, they are our economy. We have this fabulous country and good quality of life because of them, not in spite of them. If we push and prod and poke until they take their ball home, we will have not chance of making Britain great again by ourselves. We'd be a third world country with no manufacturing and no income.
Er... Pretty certain that they got us into this mess, only right that they do their bit (which btw most of them would barely notice).
 
  • Like
Reactions: PLT
But every expert has said labours figures just didn't add up! It's so easy to offer the people what they want when you're the opposition! But even you must admit when asked about figures they just crumbled! Even corbyn scratching at his iPad and we won't even mention RUSS ABBOT <doh>
The Tories didn't even bother to cost theirs, they couldn't be arsed.....the IFS also said their manifesto was ****e anyway btw
 
But every expert has said labours figures just didn't add up! It's so easy to offer the people what they want when you're the opposition! But even you must admit when asked about figures they just crumbled! Even corbyn scratching at his iPad and we won't even mention RUSS ABBOT <doh>

Except Joseph Stiglitz, who won a Nobel Prize for Economics, and over 150 other economists who endorsed the Labour manifesto.
 
At this period of uncertainty with Brexit we should be pandering to their every need. We need them investing, building their businesses, spending and keeping everything flowing. They're not the backbone of our economy, they are our economy. We have this fabulous country and good quality of life because of them, not in spite of them. If we push and prod and poke until they take their ball home, we will have not chance of making Britain great again by ourselves. We'd be a third world country with no manufacturing and no income.
Are you part of the aristocracy or something? You seem majorly out of touch with topics like bankers debt and media bias.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.