Off Topic General chat

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Apparently the MP's are after a rise in expenses. Now wasn't that 11% pay rise ''justified'' on the grounds that expenses would be more controlled and limited ?
They're saying that it's because brexit has increased their workload (say the people who are on a 7 week break, part of potentially 15 weeks total in the year)
Even so, an increase in workload should surely be a temporary overtime claim, not a permanent chance to dip into the trough
 
  • Like
Reactions: Makemstine Roger
gelders pie said:
Apparently the MP's are after a rise in expenses. Now wasn't that 11% pay rise ''justified'' on the grounds that expenses would be more controlled and limited ?
They're saying that it's because brexit has increased their workload (say the people who are on a 7 week break, part of potentially 15 weeks total in the year)
Even so, an increase in workload should surely be a temporary overtime claim, not a permanent chance to dip into the trough
Click to expand...
Hate all the bastards don't care which party they are in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: farnboromackem and gelders pie
gelders pie said:
Apparently the MP's are after a rise in expenses. Now wasn't that 11% pay rise ''justified'' on the grounds that expenses would be more controlled and limited ?
They're saying that it's because brexit has increased their workload (say the people who are on a 7 week break, part of potentially 15 weeks total in the year)
Even so, an increase in workload should surely be a temporary overtime claim, not a permanent chance to dip into the trough
Click to expand...

I do actually believe criminal charges could be brought this present government for the blatant lies and deceit they have dropped on the Electorate., businesses would never get away with it so why should the Conservative Party business? Theresa May will go down as the most pointless, PM ever. She is a shambolic mess of incompetence that she tries to hide behind her school mistress demeanour, shackled by a bunch of advisors who are failed wannabe MP's.. It's gonna get a lot worse over the next few months, just wish we had a proper opposition to bury them... Dave Milliband.<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrRAWhite and clockstander
Joe.. said:
I do actually believe criminal charges could be brought this present government for the blatant lies and deceit they have dropped on the Electorate., businesses would never get away with it so why should the Conservative Party business? Theresa May will go down as the most pointless, PM ever. She is a shambolic mess of incompetence that she tries to hide behind her school mistress demeanour, shackled by a bunch of advisors who are failed wannabe MP's.. It's gonna get a lot worse over the next few months, just wish we had a proper opposition to bury them... Dave Milliband.<ok>
Click to expand...

Hear hear ! (sorry , just agreeing, didn’ mean to sound like them !)
 
  • Like
Reactions: J๏E..
Joe.. said:
I do actually believe criminal charges could be brought this present government for the blatant lies and deceit they have dropped on the Electorate., businesses would never get away with it so why should the Conservative Party business? Theresa May will go down as the most pointless, PM ever. She is a shambolic mess of incompetence that she tries to hide behind her school mistress demeanour, shackled by a bunch of advisors who are failed wannabe MP's.. It's gonna get a lot worse over the next few months, just wish we had a proper opposition to bury them... Dave Milliband.<ok>
Click to expand...
Should start with Blair just for being a slimy twat.<ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: gelders pie, Saf and J๏E..
Rules Check: The goalie blocks the original PK, but an attacker places the rebound into the back of the net; but the attacker entered the 18 yard box too early. Result: Retake the PK???
 
Anybody see Marcos Alonzo rolling down Main St. today? Yedlin shoulder checked him so hard, 5 minutes in at SJP, I'm sure he landed in Sunderland!
 
Hefty fullback said:
Rules Check: The goalie blocks the original PK, but an attacker places the rebound into the back of the net; but the attacker entered the 18 yard box too early. Result: Retake the PK???
Click to expand...
I've just seen this, Hefty. That should be a free kick to the defensive team.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back