Gaston

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Is smiley really necessary? I always thought that a joke not accompanied by the smiley is supposed to be delivered in deadpan mode. :D

A joke must be obviously a joke to not require a smiley. A joke, that could be misconstrued as being otherwise serious, needs a smiley to make sure all-hell doesn't kick off afterwards.


After all, body language is not a strong suit in an internet forum. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilcoSaint
Is smiley really necessary? I always thought that a joke not accompanied by the smiley is supposed to be delivered in deadpan mode. :D

I have never, not once, used a smiley. Ever. Jokes should stand on their own. People shouldn't need "Warning: JOKE" attached to anything if it's real humour. Anyone who misses jokes because they aren't labelled as such needs an emoticon inserting where the smiley doesn't shine.

And don't get me started on "lol".

Vin
 
I have never, not once, used a smiley. Ever. Jokes should stand on their own. People shouldn't need "Warning: JOKE" attached to anything if it's real humour. Anyone who misses jokes because they aren't labelled as such needs an emoticon inserting where the smiley doesn't shine.

And don't get me started on "lol".

Vin
I think David Mitchell makes some good points about the use of "lol"
You must log in or register to see media
 
I have a mate (honestly I do) who has been known as and referred to as Lol for about 30 years. He signs off his texts and mails with this, but never uses smileys...now I'm just totally confused and have to re-evaluate everything he has ever texted me. Something like "See you at 9:00 then. Lol" possibly makes meeting up a real gamble.
 
I think David Mitchell makes some good points about the use of "lol"
You must log in or register to see media

I should have been clearer. I don't mind "lol" as the response to a joke or comment. Perfectly acceptable, if glib.

My problem is its use where I might expect a smiley from someone less brain-damaged. For example "But Gaston's worth £100M, lol". For that offence, I suggest a rusty bayonet slowly inserted through the chest would be a mild punishment.

In my family we like the deeply sarcastic abbreviation suggested by Bill Bailey, namely "neli". It's often used by my kids after a spectacular exhibition of what they call "Dad humour" and it means "not even laughing inwardly". I love my kids, lol.

Vin