Garrido?

[bedfordcanary]

I really really really think everyone has been blinded to Garridos obvious inadequacies because of his decent start. For me he is not good enough. Perhaps we should keep him if he is cheap but only as cover. Id rather have Whittaker or Naughton than Garrido anytime!

I think if we let Tierney go and buy Garrido, we still need someone better to take the LB slot.

Garrido is slow, gets caught out of position and is very poor going forward. Anyone who says "what about his crossing ablity?" Ask yourselves, when did he last produce a good cross that led to anything? Then before that when was the last time? Hugh gaps in between id wager. He is a cover standard LB at best.

 

[canary-dave]

bump

 

[K E M P]

bump

Why the bumps Dave?

 

[BillyNCFC]

I think people got a bit carried away at the beginning of his loan. I think he gets beaten a bit easily, isn't always in the right position and doesn't use his crossing which is his strength nearly enough. Think Whittaker is a more tidy player who seems to get involved in the game a lot better than garrido.

 

[canary-dave]

Why the bumps Dave?

It wouldn't load page 2 until I bumped it!

 

[K E M P]

Oh dear,

Better get the geezer back from Spain!

 

[ThaiCanary]

There is an easy solution to not Duplicating threads - Stop clicking on the "Post Quick Reply" button! Once will do and if it asks if you want to leave the page, select yes. The post will show once and once only

 

[bedfordcanary]

Billy pretty much said what I said in fewer words lol

Bottom line is, Garrido probably is good enough to be a premier league starting LB but can do a job as back up.

 

[King_of_Portman_Rd]

Made me look like a right twat that did

You can say that again and again and again and again and again etc..........

Just kidding.

The silly bugger didn't play did he!?

It looks like you lot are doing things the hard way... I suppose when the day comes when you are confirmed safe it'll feel all the more sweet