Daily Racing Thread Friday 14th. March 2025

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Well said.
I made a note of Poniros after he put up a smart performance at Windsor against one of the horses I follow. He ran at Royal Ascot but by then his form thad ailed off and he seemed to have his own ideas. He was then gelded and ran one poor race before being cleared out of Beckett's stable at the HiT sale.

By yesterday I'd forgotten that note I made.....dummy.
 
Tamerlo said:
Nass, you’re a bigger cynic than me! <laugh>
You may be right, though, but let’s hope not.
Click to expand...


I think the ground was a massive factor in the Triumph Hurdle and all of Gold Cup day, and I think on anything but the same ground, you’d have a very different story from the day.

I thought Lulamba had run a massive race in the triumph, but to me he wasn’t letting himself down on the ground and I thought similar for GDC. It just shows that external factors can play massive roles in big races.

Not many of us would have forecast that ground when it’s been so wet all winter.
 
NassauBoard said:
I think the ground was a massive factor in the Triumph Hurdle and all of Gold Cup day, and I think on anything but the same ground, you’d have a very different story from the day.

I thought Lulamba had run a massive race in the triumph, but to me he wasn’t letting himself down on the ground and I thought similar for GDC. It just shows that external factors can play massive roles in big races.

Not many of us would have forecast that ground when it’s been so wet all winter.
Click to expand...

They really can’t have any complaints about “good to soft” ground, Nass.
If anything, Poniros showed real stamina and resolution to win his race, and he may have won more easily with softer ground.
Who knows?
As regards GDC, he has won on all types of ground and may have got into a better rhythm by leading.
 
Tamerlo said:
They really can’t have any complaints about “good to soft” ground, Nass.
If anything, Poniros showed real stamina and resolution to win his race, and he may have won more easily with softer ground.
Who knows?
As regards GDC, he has won on all types of ground and may have got into a better rhythm by leading.
Click to expand...


It wasn’t good to soft ground though.
 
NassauBoard said:
again, doesn’t mean it was.
Click to expand...
Timeform will always independently validate the official going description, using race times and sectional times, as well as input from its racecourse reporters and from independent and highly sophisticated meteorological sources.

So what are we to believe Nass? We know the going stick is not reliable as it is done hours before racing and not checked during nor after racing
 
Ron said:
Timeform will always independently validate the official going description, using race times and sectional times, as well as input from its racecourse reporters and from independent and highly sophisticated meteorological sources.

So what are we to believe Nass? We know the going stick is not reliable as it is done hours before racing and not checked during nor after racing
Click to expand...

Although subject to change at any time, please note Race Reports are provided in a draft state until 48 hours after racing to provide early visibility of our analysis. Draft reports do not necessarily represent the view of Timeform.

As stated on the triumph hurdle result. It’ll be interesting to see what they come up with the final analysis.

The problem with the ground is that it’s so inconsistent and nearly impossible to view accurately. For instance the times suggest the chase course was riding faster than the hurdles. How could we have known this?
 
NassauBoard said:
Although subject to change at any time, please note Race Reports are provided in a draft state until 48 hours after racing to provide early visibility of our analysis. Draft reports do not necessarily represent the view of Timeform.

As stated on the triumph hurdle result. It’ll be interesting to see what they come up with the final analysis.

The problem with the ground is that it’s so inconsistent and nearly impossible to view accurately. For instance the times suggest the chase course was riding faster than the hurdles. How could we have known this?
Click to expand...
Also quoting from Timeform <cheers>

Doesn't give backers much hope does it, the emphasis that Phil Bull put on ground conditions

No wonder I'm not having much success <laugh>
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back