#FreeSpurlock

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
As grasses usually don’t like to advertise, I wouldn’t know.

Saxton has grassed that many times about anythIng and everything.

As has been pointed out several times, insults are openly thrown about on just about every thread on this board, why should thst one thread be held exempt?
Because it's childish and some don't contribute other than to hurl abuse around.
 
That’s your opinion. The majority of posters on the PL board would disagree.

It’s the one board where there’s not normally any modding.
Well don't post on the no abuse thread if you can't control yourself.
Fling **** on all the others
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
Ironically you are on here constantly too.
I do post a lot during the week. I don't stick almost exclusively to one thread though. I like a bit of banter and to discuss football on this football forum. I often don't post as much at weekends as I'm busy. KC's post count can go through the roof on weekends!
 
I do post a lot during the week. I don't stick almost exclusively to one thread though. I like a bit of banter and to discuss football on this football forum. I often don't post much at weekends as I'm busy. KC's post count can go through the roof on weekends!
Well that's why he makes a good mod.
 
Then you will keep getting banned it's not that difficult to fathom out.
Do you think that making DMD mod and his self appointed decision to take a Pravdaesque approach to controlling the content of his thread has helped advance the political debate and generally improved the content, quality and atmosphere on the PL board?
 
That's why he was chosen as a mod. brb's comment about it was hilarious! <laugh>
As a result if the no abuse rule I have interacted with you and others in s positive way.
I am not averse to **** posting and name calling but when I know it's not acceptable the discussion is much better.

I'm not a flying monkey or any other Wizard of Oz character and take people as I find them.
Even you can be ok and humerous at times.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
@Dier Hard your point about posters having loads of other forums they could go to for fluffy political debate is very valid, particularly when you consider that the three posters on that politics thread who want the content to be censored all support Championship teams. It's odd that they are demanding protection to post their anti-islamic views on the PL board. Ironically less tolerant people would argue that they shouldn't be posting on the PL board at all. Closed borders and all that stuff.
 
You seem to think the only solution to eradicating childish abuse on that one thread is to abandon it and go on a different board.

They came up with a solution Dmd gets to mod it and ban childish offensive posters and their comments.

Nobody is forcing anyone to post on it , there is even a spin off new one that is unmoderated .

No, I've actually made three solutions.
1) Don't ban people, that way no mod can be accused of having an agenda or being biased towards certain posters.
2) The posters who don't like the abusive side of this board should create or join a thread elsewhere where abuse isn't tolerated.
3) Make me a mod, so then I can just unban everyone.

This whole section of the board is childish and offensive - it's why many of us like it. To expect one thread to remain civil is naive, as I've constantly pointed out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JakartaToon
Do you think that making DMD mod and his self appointed decision to take a Pravdaesque approach to controlling the content of his thread has helped advance the political debate and generally improved the content, quality and atmosphere on the PL board?
Yes .

I think you are missing a hyphen.

*Pravda-esque


If you contribute to that thread without the snyde digs and stick to arguing your position you will not be banned.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
As a result if the no abuse rule I have interacted with you and others in s positive way.
I am not averse to **** posting and name calling but when I know it's not acceptable the discussion is much better.

I'm not a flying monkey or any other Wizard of Oz character and take people as I find them.
Even you can be ok and humerous at times.
I'm a ****ing riot mate. A prison riot because that's where people like me should be FOREVER.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Nope. Much as this truth will hurt you, you made several requests that got you absolutely nowhere, I stepped in, and it still took a couple more requests and a chat before you got back on.

As I said, you don't understand much of what actually goes on.
I made no requests to anyone barring you on the thread. so you’re lying yet again, you’re full of ****.

And then brb lifted the ban here;

https://www.not606.com/threads/the-...afe-space-here.341752/page-4753#post-11663112
 
Yes .

I think you are missing a hyphen.

*Pravda-esque


If you contribute to that thread without the snyde digs and stick to arguing your position you will not be banned.
But I have to accept that the obese garage nonce who isn't actually very well off is allowed to insult me but I can't have a pop back?

Not sure about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock